3,000 deaths in iraq to a libreal is horrible and according to them 3,000 young people loseing there life is a sin against humanity
100,000 abortons on the other hand is fine infact killing babys should be every human's right according to libreals.
Why do Libreals claim they hate the war in iraq because of the death toll? Your fine with thousands of babys getting there brains getting sucked out threw a tube, the death toll in iraq should be a minor concern to libreals due to the fact that death and killing is something there party supports.
2006-11-24 02:38:46 · 13 answers · asked by Joshua V 2 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
Let me make this clear to all you liberals who decided instead of answering the question you verbally insult me. I think that ALL death is bad. To me there is no difference between someone wearing a stethoscope takeing a life and someone wearing a turban takeing a life. To me there are both horrible. My question was not which is worse than the other, or anything to do with the iraq war, or Bush. My question was simple. Why do libreals(vast majority) think that it is okay for someone to be murded in a doctor's office but it(to liberals) is not okay to be murdered in iraq. please rember I am not saying that it is ok to be murderded in iraq afganistan or anywhere by that matter. This question was asked to libreals I was NOT stateing my oppinion on matter I was merely asking a question please answer it.
2006-11-25 06:27:19 · update #1
Why do you care about aborted fetuses and not for an adult human who has a family, people who loves them and who they love?
Your stance is more bizarre and heartless to me than mine.
Your disregard for death in Iraq is very telling of the cold hearted murderous pretentious selfish devils who call themselves republicans.
Your objection to abortion is actually spiteful punishment leveled against the pregnant woman, than a desire to save a life. You could care less about babies or fetuses; that's just your pathetic public relations cover for your true reasons.
You're all just a bunch of miserable hypocrites who get your happiness from seeing others unhappy or suffering.
And that, satan, is why you don't care about any deaths in Iraq.
2006-11-24 02:44:45 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 10⤊ 0⤋
You presume to think liberals, what… hate all wars? Very few conservatives would say ‘all wars are just’ and very few liberals would say ‘all wars are unjust’. Sure, some would, nutjobs exist at the end of any scale. Some right-to-lifers say abortion should be illegal even in situations of conception through incest and rape. Do they make up the bulk of the right to life movement? The US still has the death penalty in many states, what’s your stand on that? Iraq was based on deciding to go there and then finding a reason to justify going to satisfy the American (and world) public. Intelligence was cherry picked by politicians and when it all fell on its ****, as intelligence officers knew it would, they got to cop the blame for it to boot.. It was a bad war even before it was started, it did not go bad simply because it screwed up nor would it have been a good war even if it were won.
2006-11-27 22:58:16 · answer #2 · answered by John M 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
"Libreals"??? Why would anyone pay any attention to a semi illiterate like you? Did you ever hear of a mixed metaphor? An irrelevant comparison? A flawed argument? I thought not.
2006-11-24 10:42:49 · answer #3 · answered by notyou311 7 · 9⤊ 0⤋
Yeah, I don't understand why our military gets picked on for getting in harm's way, their mission to try & stabilize Iraq. I can't remember the 'dedicated media' ever stressing the thousands of lives 'these people who are attacking all non-radical Islams' are picking off. At least US is starting somewhere to deal with this, now if all the other non-rad Islam nations will wake-up and realize they will eventually bow or bow out and all unite like w/hitler we would have a chance at survival. BTW don't women have a choice to slip the condom on or pill, patch etc. so they won't have to go through the possibility of producing a fetus they'll just have to cut out?
2006-11-24 11:24:14 · answer #4 · answered by spareo1 4 · 0⤊ 4⤋
It takes a real low-life to use the deaths of courageous (whether you agree with the mission or not) American troops to push an unrelated, otherwise unsupportable agenda. Crawl back into the slime you came from.
2006-11-24 11:02:11 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 0⤋
People will do or say (with contradictions and twists) to further their own agenda. I neither support Vietnam part 2 nor abortion. i support legality of abortion not the action. There are people in this world who should have been aborted, and there are parents who should have been banned from having kids.
2006-11-24 10:44:51 · answer #6 · answered by Your #1 fan 6 · 8⤊ 0⤋
You hit the nail on the head ... they gripe about deaths in Iraq and they will fight till the day is long for the humane treatment of chickens BUT when it comes to abortion, they support killing innocent unborn babies at the drop of a hat.
2006-11-24 10:50:12 · answer #7 · answered by ValleyR 7 · 0⤊ 5⤋
Your Judging and brother that's not your job, its' God's, get it!
2006-11-28 08:56:16 · answer #8 · answered by Conrey 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
theydont care at all, it is just a issue they use for political gain
2006-11-24 21:19:51 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
The real question is:
Why DON'T you care?
2006-11-24 10:46:15 · answer #10 · answered by devlsadvoct 2 · 9⤊ 0⤋