Do you people realize how many years of medical education, experience, and expertise you are trying to debunk by claiming that addicts "don't have to pick up" their vise?(be it another ding dong or another bottle)
And is that kind of comment soley an intensional means of relieving yourself from helping an addict. I mean it seems that if you can convince yourself that the drunk's next trip to the liquor store is a choice then you can relieve yourself from contributing to his recovery. Does that kinda sum up that statement of "choice"?
As a person that has worked with many addicts and especially alcoholics I am appalled at the number of people that want to discredit the American Medical Association's 1951 findings that Alcoholism is a disease rather than a choice. I am just curious as to the need to discredit that disease and yet at the same time accept that, say cancer, is a real disease.
2006-11-22
22:10:04
·
4 answers
·
asked by
who
2
in
Social Science
➔ Psychology