not like actor Daniel Craig? (hes the new Bond before ppl start saying who is he!) I mean i dont know what he has done wrong for ppl to be so nasty about him. I think he is quite a good actor and seems a nice enough chap, so why are the british press so bad about him?
2006-11-22 21:54:00 · 20 answers · asked by princesssp8 4 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Celebrities
and i dont mean just recently before he was the new bond they were slating him for no reason at all? why?
2006-11-22 21:57:57 · update #1
I don't know.
People were up in arms when Pierce Brosnan took over the role of Bond, and then ended up crying into their cornflakes when he got replaced.
Daniel Craig is a fine actor (see Layer Cake or Munich).
I think the reviews for Casino Royale have been very positive, now that people have seen the film, and generally agree he's the best Bond since Sean Connery.
It doesn't do any harm that he's also extremely good-looking!
2006-11-22 21:58:51 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
People get pleasure from slating others, and not just celebrities. It's human nature. I think it's very sad and pathetic. As for Daniel, I think it's refreshing to see a Bond that is a bit different from others and I'm sure he will prove all these haters wrong.
2006-11-23 01:48:20 · answer #2 · answered by La 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
man u got to the top and the press slated them, chelsea are doing well and the press are knocking them, robbie williams was the cheeky chappy from take that before he left and let him go for a while and the press slated him, george michael was allegedly great in wham and his eal;ry solo career now the press slate him cos of some of the recent press hes been getting, its an obsession the press here in the uk has of bigging people up and when they get to the top they slap em back down again
2006-11-22 22:11:07 · answer #3 · answered by Andy S 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
well a lot of magazines and papers are saying that he isnt the type of guy to play the new Bond and he couldnt act very well in the movie!
i like him too but the media just criticise anybody and everybody! they probly had nuthin to talk about so they went for Daniel Criag!
2006-11-23 05:54:37 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
because each and every from time to time that's authentic. I advise soem lesbians are difficult and they are on the right of the foodstuff chain they purely pick to strive against for what's perfect I advise George Bush became going to restrict something like that. they purely pick to freedom educate the human beings they are interior yet some human beings misjudge Lesbians.
2016-11-29 09:43:43 · answer #5 · answered by Erika 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Personally, i've got nothing against him. I just think he will not fit in the role of Lord Asriel in the coming movie adaptation of His Dark Materials by Philip Pullman. Otherwise, i don't really care about him. As long as nobody's being bad about Johnny Depp, i'm content...:D
2006-11-22 22:13:14 · answer #6 · answered by Off-with-their-heads! 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Because he is an alien sent from planet yahoo with intentions of selling WMD's.Enough said.P.s He seems the part,Bond that is!
2006-11-22 22:00:47 · answer #7 · answered by pisspot 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i know.. he was going to do the film because he knew people wouldn't like a blonde bond. but it think he's the best looking out of them all and it suits him being bond
2006-11-22 23:02:54 · answer #8 · answered by tanj_maria 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Typical of the british press, if they havn't got anything nice to say about people they make it up. Load of sh*ts really!!!
2006-11-22 21:57:25 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Jealousy.
2006-11-22 22:01:00 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋