I thought it was great! A good change from the last couple that rely more on graphics and futuristic gadgets. A real hard hitting back to basics bond; just what they needed. I did think the slightly longer start was right though with the film showing how he became 007, so there was some justification to having it. I do agree the ending did seem to go on a bit.. I'm going to have to see it again soon. Loved the poker, stunts and the new gritty Bond character.
2006-11-22 22:08:13
·
answer #1
·
answered by Chris 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
NO! Casino Royale and Quantum of Solace are a new franchise. It's is from when Bond has just been made an agent.
2016-05-22 21:38:55
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
It was a but plodding, I'm not a big James Bond fan or even a movie buff to be honest but I did kind of like the ending. Sort of explains (not justifies) why he's always been a bit of a mysoginist. I didn't like the fight scenes, maybe because I was full of the free Baracadi's that the club next door had given me, but I felt each fight scene was disorientating, almost like the camera man from Blair Witch had taken over. It was probably trying to be too realistic and gritty, like a Frank Miller comic (the guy who did Sin City.) I didn't find it particularly funny, but the rest of the audience did and my mates (big 007 fans) seemed to love it. I'm a real cynic of so I suppose the fact that I din't hate it means its probably quite good for the rest of you non-cynics.
2006-11-25 07:46:30
·
answer #3
·
answered by Boywonder 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yep - too long. Too much yakking and not enough arsekicking. Though apparently they wanted to make it more like the book. Must say I prefer Bond films that end in blowing up some evil-doer's secret headquarters.
2006-11-22 21:54:04
·
answer #4
·
answered by Mad Professor 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
I thought it was cool, I love the poker scene, not the best bond movie, but not the worse, only time will tell if Daniel Craig is good.
2006-11-22 21:49:39
·
answer #5
·
answered by KKL2006 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
I have seen it twice and planning for a third time. I really loved and Daniel Criag is just brillant.
2006-11-22 23:04:01
·
answer #6
·
answered by PrincessNatalie 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I haven't had a chance to see the movie as I have been working.
2006-11-22 21:49:33
·
answer #7
·
answered by StatIdiot 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Wow is it really good? I want to watch it but it hasn't been screened here yet.
2006-11-22 21:48:55
·
answer #8
·
answered by bilezlatko 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
i agree with the mad professor
2006-11-22 22:47:26
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋