English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I think the best batsmen who can plan well in this kind of situation are Shewag, Sachin, Sourav, Laksman and Dravid. The best bowlers were Agarkar and Kumble.

Yesterday we have only Sachin and Dravid to save the team. In a very good bowling pitch, it is foolish to depend on only 2 batsmen out of 7.

All the other batsmen don’t have good experience in this kind of bouncing pitches. It is obvious that are we going to loose.

It is not a wise move to play against such a good team with only young players. All criticism should go to the Selection committee.

2006-11-22 19:12:03 · 12 answers · asked by Senthil M 1 in Sports Cricket

12 answers

Our players have become superrich so they do not
have any dedication for the game and responsibilities for
the nation. If our board permits them to use dummies(like hindi movie dummies}, all of them will merrily put dummies
and watch the game from pavilion by having Pepsi/coke
and some good chicks on their side. They have become
filthy rich so they might be paying regular money to the
board members or their sponserers could be doing so for
having a permanenant seat.

2006-11-22 19:52:16 · answer #1 · answered by desai_abhay 5 · 0 0

You have given both the question and the answer. So there is little to add to that. Blaming the selection committee alone wouldn't help. When the selection meeting was on, did Chappell and Dravid ask for experienced players like Sourav and Laxman? Surely not. And the reason? Dirty politics of course. And did the Selection Committee tell Dravid and Chappell to exclude Kumble from the side in the second ODI? The final team before any match is selected by the captain in consultation with the coach. So what's the selection committee's fault there? They can't be made scape goat for everything. The fault lies elsewhere and it is very much visible.

2006-11-22 19:23:39 · answer #2 · answered by Modest 6 · 1 0

If you see the past records, you will find that even experienced players had not done well in South Africa. Considering this fact I do not think there is anything wrong in trying out younger players if it gives them good exposure in playing such conditions and improve their performance in future. Since World Cup is only few months away, India have to build a pool of probable from which they can select the team for the world cup. Players like Laxman nd Ganguly do not require exposure to the conditions abroad, whereas the inexperienced players surely need such exposure.

2006-11-22 19:50:42 · answer #3 · answered by vakayil k 7 · 0 1

extremely precise my guy. It substitute right into a bowlers pitch. even if it extremely is not any excuse for a damaging batting overall performance. different batsmen to boot Tendulkar and Dravid will ought to start scoring huge runs outdoors the sub-continent. The selectors ought to especially evaluate bringing back Ganguly and Luxman. even if enable us to no longer ignore that India have been lacking key gamers with the aid of harm.

2016-11-26 02:44:24 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Normally the piches in INDIA are very slow and good for spinners and Batsmans.
New players are coming from domestic cricket to International Cricket after playing on these piches.
So INDIA must provide the bouncy Pitches to their youngsters.

2006-11-22 19:20:53 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

that goes to show how imbecile you can get, thinking the indian team is so talented. at best it's a second string team. lack of commitment usually makes it a 3rd rate team.

2006-11-22 19:23:46 · answer #6 · answered by irumporayar 3 · 1 0

It can WIN
ONLY if

the existing non-performers are removed

and capable people are put into the job in different area of cricket like

1)players
2) captain
3) coach
4) selector
5) CICKET CONTROL BOARD

2006-11-23 02:23:47 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Yeh log firangi jooti ke neeche hi rahenge.

All these bastards just wanna make money, from that chamar Sharad Pawar downwards.

2006-11-22 20:02:40 · answer #8 · answered by umangu 3 · 0 0

I agree. How Raina, Kaif and Mongia were playing, ridiculous. Lakshman and Saurav deserve a place.

2006-11-22 19:17:57 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

saurav Ganguly Deserves a place because all know that he is very well caption and is able to manage the team very well in critical situations too.

2006-11-22 19:21:41 · answer #10 · answered by Pious 3 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers