2006-11-22 17:31:33 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Cricket
Its not only the problem with chappel.... but the problem is also with Chappel and he is being paid to solve it...another problem is he does not know to play the best 11.....
2006-11-22 18:07:20 · answer #1 · answered by Krishna 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There is no point in blaming the Coach or Captain for the failure of the players to perform to their potential. How can you blame a Captain if an experienced and world class spinner concede 17 runs in an over and also the experienced bowlers are unable to contain the batsmen in the slog overs. How can you blama a Captain and the Coach if a fielder is slow to field the ball and return to the Bowler. How can you blame the Captain and the Coach if a fielder drops a catch. So ultimately for the por performance of Indin Team, the players are to be blamed.
2006-11-23 04:38:19 · answer #2 · answered by vakayil k 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
My dear Mr. hemant p, the coach of India's cricket team is Greg Chappell and not Chappal (slippers), though by now a garland of chappals is what Greg Chappell deserves. Don't forget that Rahul Dravid owes his captaincy thanks to the famous or rather infamous Greg Chappell-Sourav Ganguly email row. Ganguly was an outspoken captain, whose century in the India-Zimbabwe series should have made our national selectors not only include him in the Indian side but retain him as the Indian skipper as well. But Chappell dislikes outspoken, no nonsense captains who question his mistakes or disagree to toe his line or show dissent. So out went Ganguly, India's most successful captain ever and in came Dravid, who was restlessly waiting for his chance to become captain by hook or by crook. Dravid knows that he must keep mum in order to retain his captaincy. Else Chappell will use his cunning machinations to replace him with a more pliant captain. So in any press conference Dravid praises Chappell and Chappell praises Dravid. Each has his own axe to grind. And as long as their personal ambitions are being fulfilled, let the performances and fortunes of Team India go to hell. And curiously enough, a section of prominent and influential BCCI office bearers find non-existent virtues in Chappell, because Chappell is cunning enough to be at the right side of the powers that be at the right time. It suits them fine to retain a mum captain under Chappell. Now who would you consider the bigger evil for Indian cricket - Chappell or Dravid? Hope you understand what keeps Dravid mum and why the board likes it that way.
2006-11-23 02:39:51 · answer #3 · answered by Modest 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I agree. The coach can only use the people he has to work with. The players should have the skills to deliver a quality game every time as they as professional sports people and need to remember that they are only as good as the last game they played. There are heaps of good cricketers in India and heaps to choose from. If they do not deliver, sack them and give the coach some fresh players. Get rid of these old tired players who can't bat or bowl.
2006-11-23 03:09:30 · answer #4 · answered by Buzzard 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It can WIN
ONLY if
the existing non-performers are removed
and capable people are put into the job in different area of cricket like
1)players
2) captain
3) coach
4) selector
5) CICKET CONTROL BOARD
2006-11-23 10:24:22 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Give life long rest to:
BCCI President Shri PAWAR
SELECTOR-Shri Vengsarker
Coach-Shri Cheppal
Captain- Shri Dravid and Tendulkar
Indian cricket team
ALL ARE ACCOUNTABLE AND RESPONSIBLE FOR FAILURE
2006-11-23 09:46:54 · answer #6 · answered by narayan 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
captain has to take blame to
2006-11-24 00:12:47 · answer #7 · answered by john 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
"sab ek hi thali ke chatte batte hai"
2006-11-23 03:00:24 · answer #8 · answered by Rocky D 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋