2006-11-22 17:10:11 · 9 answers · asked by The Knowledge Server 1 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
you are the most irritating person on this yahoo answers.
Nothing you ask makes any sense to any of .who speak english
Please please go away or get someone to help you use words that peole understand what you are saying
2006-11-22 17:19:54 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
A process is a composition. For example, like processed cheese. A process can not be a decomposition; because decmposition is a breakdown or destroyed matter. Ergo, as composition is a positive term for existence; decomposition becomes a negative term; leading to extinction.
2006-11-23 02:17:30 · answer #2 · answered by rosieC 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
According to "Rational Spirituality", the intelligent person's modern bible, every process encompasses equally both. Nothing is created, or processed, out of nothing. And therefore, the composition of whatever must entail the decomposition of something else.
2006-11-23 02:36:57 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Decomposition ultimately leads to composition and composition leads to decomposition. Death is life and life is death. Then really it is impossible to separate the two. They only seem separate because of the period of adjustment between the two. Still for something to die something gains more life and for something to get life something has to die. For example, when you eat something it is decomposition but the stuff eaten becomes part of your composition while it is decomposing. Where is the difference, the fine line between the two?
2006-11-23 02:34:22 · answer #4 · answered by weism 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
gggggggggggeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
you don't make any sense
Go back to school and learn proper english.
Stop wasting our time here.
STOP
I find you to be the most irritating person I have ever come across in my entire life
Just go away. go where you speak your language and ask these questions. and please leave us alone
2006-11-25 07:58:33 · answer #5 · answered by cuttiestrawberypie 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Both, simultaneously rather, something gives up for something else to have it !
2006-11-23 07:29:23 · answer #6 · answered by Spiritualseeker 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
neither creation or destruction exisits. all merely is.
2006-11-25 01:29:02 · answer #7 · answered by ỉη ץ٥ڵ 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
my opinion is that you are nuts. you ask the same questions over and over again.
WHy?
Stop please
2006-11-23 01:31:44 · answer #8 · answered by sugarsweetsweetiepie 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What?
2006-11-23 01:16:07 · answer #9 · answered by clcalifornia 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋