(logx)^2+log(x^5)=-6
(logx)^2+5logx+6=0
let y = logx
y^2 + 5y + 6 = 0
(y+3)(y+2)=0
y = -2 or -3
logx = -2 or -3
x = 10^-2 or 10^-3
x = 1/100 or 1/1000
2006-11-22 16:49:31
·
answer #1
·
answered by Scott R 6
·
3⤊
0⤋
(logx)^2+logx^5=-6
let logx=t
then t =-2 or -3.so,x=1/100 or 1/1000;(if base is 10,otherwise if base is 2 then the answers are 1/4 or 1/8)
2006-11-22 17:10:21
·
answer #2
·
answered by bhakti k 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
(logx)^2+logx^5=-6
So (logx)^2 + 5 logx + 6 = 0
(logx + 2)(log x + 3) = 0
log x = -3, -2
x = 0.01, 0.001
2006-11-22 17:04:36
·
answer #3
·
answered by Wal C 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
(logx)^2+logx^5= -6
or (logx)^2+5logx + 6= 0
or (logx +2 )(logx + 3) = 0
or, logx = -2 or logx = -3
or x = 10^-2 or x = 10^-3
or, x= 0.01 or x = 0.001
2006-11-22 16:56:39
·
answer #4
·
answered by The Potter Boy 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Let u = log(x); the equation can then be written
u^2 + 5*u + 6 = 0
(u + 2)*(u + 3) = 0
u = -2 and u = -3
log(x) = -2 and log(x) = -3;
x = 10^-2 , x = 10^-3
2006-11-22 16:53:04
·
answer #5
·
answered by gp4rts 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
How are kevin nash, the undertaker, astonishing warrior, and mick foley all very close to to this celebrity and the grasp of ladder fits at 6 ft 7 inches and 279 pounds? This persons debut is in 1985 and howdy have on no account wrestled interior the wwe yet they have interior the wwf meaning it substitute into in between 1985 and might 2002. the only individual who fits this description interior the slightest could be razor ramon/scott hall who you ruled out. I have no clue who this could be if so yet i could choose for to assert that somebody who has participated in a sinle ladder experience isn't seen a "a grasp at Ladder fits!" I only wish the respond dosen't contradict this problematical question.
2016-11-26 02:37:29
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
The question should be corrected in the second term of LHS as (log x)^5
2006-11-22 17:01:10
·
answer #7
·
answered by rajr59 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
what's that?
2006-11-22 16:55:58
·
answer #8
·
answered by rredrumm00 2
·
0⤊
1⤋