Am I the only white woman on the planet who realizes that OJ did not commit murder?

Question

I'm a production engineer, I hold two master's degrees and am writing my doctoral thesis, I am a scientist. The evidence wasn't there. Am I the only one besides the jury? Am I the only one who believes the Browns and the Goldmans should just stop whining.and If OJ can cash out on a book, go for it?

Answer 1

There is the possibility that they were killed in a move to force Clinton to sign the Violence Against Women Act, releasing $8 billion, with no controls, to women's shelters. The law bans any money being spent on male victims of abuse, and/or their children. It also requires a finding of guilty when an allegation is made, and that if a man defends himself from an abusive woman, he's to be charged as a abuser.

Answer 2

I could go on about OJ's guilt for hours! The only evidence you would need, if you were a scientist of human nature, was the infamous "Slow Speed Chase". That in itself was completely telling of his guilt. Did you ever hear of anyone doing something like that? The man was obviously so overwhelmed by what he had just done that he was simply beside himself, unable to decide between blowing out his own brains, running, or merely confessing. This story that he was so distraught about his wife's murder is nonsense. He is too big an egotist to react to any other person's life or death, if he were not somehow involved in it. I believe that as time went on in the chase, he started to see things differently, as he saw people on the street cheering him on. That need to keep the flame burning for his "newly resurrected fame"; like he was running for the big game winning touchdown, along with Al Cowlings reassurance, gave him the strength to come out of what was a kind of nervous breakdown. If they had only stopped the chase earlier, before he became so emboldened, he would have spilled his guts all over the floor! Secondly, you say the evidence wasn't there to convict. The key here is that there was enough evidence, even blood, that pointed at OJ, but that was all disavowed by the trickery of his defense team. To say that there was no racism involved is probably not true. But at the same time, it is highly unlikely, that all of the individuals involved had equally intense racist motives, and if they did, to a man, would they have jepardized their jobs for it! How could the police be such bunglers at everything, but when it came to tampering with the evidence they were so masterfully in sync? So, we do know that there was at least some evidence, albeit allegedly tampered with, that pointed to OJ. But was there any evidence that we know of, whatsoever, that pointed to any other individual?!?! I rest my case!

Answer 3

All I can say is, "just cause you have a masters degree in science or whatever". If your dead set on defending the moron, that is just your complete stupidity. Lots of people with degrees are not good at judging a person's personality.
I guess OJ has a new "Lover"; and look what happened to last one.
Everyting fit, the shoe print was right at the scene. Johnny Cocharon was just a very good manipulator, and liar; and dumb people like you fell for it.

Answer 4

I guess you are the only one if these responses make up a true sample. Maybe you should look at getting a degree in law, that way you can get a better understanding of why he is guilty. I once had a math professor how proved that motion is impossible, but it isn't really so, or maybe you, as a scientist, believe motion is impossible. Who knows.

Answer 5

Your credentials (or your race) have nothing to do with the events on the day that Nicole was brutally murdered. By her stalker/husband. And NO ONE....NO ONE that has been tried for a violent crime should EVER demean the victim or the process by "cashing in". "Ethics" HAS a meaning regardless of a jury's guilt/innocence (sp?) verdict.

Again, yes, he did it. You are (hopefully) playing devil's advocate here and are "stirring the pot" and could not possibly believe the garbage you typed.

Answer 6

Why might an harmless individual write a e book on HOW they might HAVE dedicated the homicide - if he hadn't according to hazard I could write a e book on how i might have assasinate President Kennedy - (bear in mind it occurred until now i became into born) or according to hazard I sould write a e book on how i attempted to assasinate -President Reagan ( i became right into slightly in HS) or according to hazard I could write a e book on how I helped handle the ok city BOMBING - Hmmmmm - according to hazard we could constantly ALL write a e book approximately some crime that we could have dedicated - yet did no longer! And make a ton of $$$$ off of somebody elses doing! For some reason I basically can no longer fathom this manner of element - shall we basically face it and end making this right into a recial element - Hes to blame - why else might he "run" from the police? That became into him became into it no longer on the television in a White Ford Explorer? harmless human beings do no longer act that way! provide it up and get actual!

Answer 7

Who cares about your master's degrees. OJ got away with murder, and yes you are the only one.

Answer 8

yes, you must be the only one. All that education doesn't mean a thing. If you were part of the Goldman family I bet you would feel differently;too.

Answer 9

You mam are a fool, you must not have read the court evidence papers. there was blood all over the place in his truck and in his house. He was stalking her, violent and jealous, are you also a crack smoker? Dont say stupid stuff until you know all the facts, it is just embarrassing for you.

Answer 10

It's a shame. All that reading hasn't made you any smarter. Look at all the money you've wasted on all those fancy degree's.

Oh, and your punctuation is terrible. I don't believe anything you've written