Was this trade fair or unfair enough to be vetoed?
Jason Kidd, Adam Morrison, and Marcus Camby...for Amare Stoudemire and Shawn Marion
2006-11-22 15:02:51 · 3 answers · asked by Big Daddy 3 in Sports ➔ Fantasy Sports
I think the big loser in this deal would be the one who would receive the Shawn Marion part of the deal as it would basically be a three-for-one.
Kidd (who is averaging over 8 rebounds and 8 assists), Morrison (who is scoring out of his mind and seems to be the clear cut winner of this year's Rookie of the Year Award), and Camby (shot blocking machine) are a healthy and capable players who give you stats across the board.
Nothing against Shawn Marion who can also do everything, but the really question here is Amare and his knees, can they hold up?
Hope this helps.
2006-11-23 00:25:00 · answer #1 · answered by tedi31 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Looks a bit strange to me. It is a bit unfair and the person recieving Amare and Shawn definately got the better end of the deal.
2006-11-22 19:19:40 · answer #2 · answered by billybobcowboy 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
So...what's your question? I extremely in many circumstances do no longer prefer vetoed that...I evaluate persons did for the clarification that they do no longer recognize how underrated Lowry is and how nicely a season he's having. even with the undeniable fact that, Lowry isn't a maximum sensible 5 participant, so might desire to be they vetoed it for the clarification that of that.
2016-10-04 06:46:31 · answer #3 · answered by sashi 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋