Idiots.
I'm starting this one, let's see if you guys can figure it out:
"Don't blame me, I voted for DeNunzio!"
2006-11-22
14:55:12
·
14 answers
·
asked by
thealligator414
3
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
November 9, 1997: John Kerry's speech on the floor of the Senate, [Congressional Record, p. S12256]:
"We must recognize that there is no indication that Saddam Hussein has any intention of relenting. So we have an obligation of enormous consequence, an obligation to guarantee that Saddam Hussein cannot ignore the United Nations. He cannot be permitted to go unobserved and unimpeded toward his horrific objective of amassing a stockpile of weapons of mass destruction. This is not a matter about which there should be any debate whatsoever in the Security Council, or, certainly, in this Nation. If he remains obdurate, I believe that the United Nations must take, and should authorize immediately, whatever steps are necessary to force him to relent--and that the United States should support and participate in those steps.
2006-11-22
15:16:26 ·
update #1
We must not presume that these conclusions automatically will be accepted by every one of our allies, some of which have different interests both in the region and elsewhere, or will be of the same degree of concern to them that they are to the U.S. But it is my belief that we have the ability to persuade them of how serious this is and that the U.N. must not be diverted or bullied."
2006-11-22
15:16:52 ·
update #2
September 3, 1998: Sen. John Kerry, Committee On Armed Services And Committee On Foreign Relations, U.S. Senate, Joint Hearing
“So we’ve got a major set of choices to make here. And we’d better make them. We’ve been sliding into a fundamental policy of containment, which I share with Major Ritter the notion is disastrous to our overall proliferation interests and disastrous with respect to the Middle East and our interests with respect to Saddam Hussein and Iraq . But we have to make a decision whether we’re prepared to do what is necessary, and I mean to the point of a sustained targeting of the regime; not the Iraqi people, but the regime.”
2006-11-22
15:17:52 ·
update #3
September 23, 2001: John Kerry on CBS’ “Face The Nation”
BORGER: Do we have any information that chemical and biological attacks were part of this [September 11th]? We got news this morning about the crop-dusting manuals.
Sen. KERRY: No, at least I don't and not to my knowledge do any of my colleagues. But it is something that we know--for instance, Saddam Hussein has used weapons of mass destruction against his own people, and there is some evidence of their [terrorists] efforts to try to secure these kinds of weapons and even test them. That's why it's so vital that we get the global community to be part of this effort to begin to make their [terrorists] lives miserable.
2006-11-22
15:18:36 ·
update #4
December 11, 2001: John Kerry on Fox News’ “The O’Reilly Factor”
O'REILLY: How would you put enough pressure on him to open up inspections again?
KERRY: Well, I'll reinvigorate that process as step number one, and I think the administration is now suddenly starting to move in that direction. I think you have to work our allies sufficiently to pull that component of the effort back together. But the second thing I would do, and I wouldn't hesitate to do it, is back opposition more openly, and do it in a way that begins to put a counterinsurgency in the country itself... The important thing is that Saddam Hussein and the world knows that we think Saddam Hussein is essentially out of synch with the times. He is and has acted like a terrorist, and he has engaged in activities that are unacceptable.
2006-11-22
15:19:33 ·
update #5
December 14, 2001: John Kerry on CNN’s “Larry King Live”
KING: What about enhancing this war, Senator Kerry. What are your thoughts on going on further than Afghanistan, all terrorist places.
KERRY: Oh, I think we clearly have to keep the pressure on terrorism globally. This doesn't end with Afghanistan by any imagination. And I think the president has made that clear. I think we have made that clear. Terrorism is a global menace. It's a scourge. And it is absolutely vital that we continue, for instance, Saddam Hussein. I think we . . .
KING: We should go to Iraq?
KERRY: Well, that -- what do you and how you choose to do it, we have a lot of options. Absent smoking gun evidence linking Saddam Hussein to the immediate events of September 11, the president doesn't have the authorization to proceed forward there. But we clearly are he ought to proceed to put pressure on him with respect to the weapons of mass destruction. I think we should be supporting an opposition.
2006-11-22
15:20:25 ·
update #6
February 5, 2002: John Kerry on MSNBC’s “Hardball” with Chris Matthews
MATTHEWS: Call his bluff.
KERRY: Well, if it is a bluff. I think you have to begin there, no matter what. Whether Saddam Hussein began that process today or we begin it, you have to put the challenge of the inspections on the line. Why? Because that's the outstanding issue unresolved from the war. That's what he agreed to do, and that's where we left off with Ambassador Butler and his -- his rejecting it. I mean, it's astounding to me, frankly, that our country, as well as the United Nations, have allowed these years to go by with...
MATTHEWS: Yeah.
KERRY: ... with just a simple stonewalling. It's just amazing.
2006-11-22
15:22:10 ·
update #7
May 22, 2002: John Kerry on Fox News’ “The O’Reilly Factor”
SEN. JOHN KERRY (D), MASSACHUSETTS: I agree with you. … I think we've all reached a judgment that obviously the United States has to protect our national security interests. And we have to do what we think is right. I do think the European demonstrations are larger than just Iraq. I think they're concerned about other issues, like global warming. They're concerned about proliferation. They're concerned about -- I mean, there are a whole host of issues. So I think it's a more confused bag than just Iraq, but I think they're wrong on Iraq. I mean, plain and simply, the United States will have to do what we need to do, and our best judgment to protect our national security. And quite frankly, if we do what we need to do, it will also wind up protecting Europe.
2006-11-22
15:23:17 ·
update #8
July 29, 2002: Senator John Kerry, Speech To The 2002 DLC National Conversation, New York, NY
“I agree completely with this Administration’s goal of a regime change in Iraq – Saddam Hussein is a renegade and outlaw who turned his back on the tough conditions of his surrender put in place by the United Nations in 1991.”
2006-11-22
15:23:51 ·
update #9
Nah but I am sick of seeing W in 04 stickers on mini vans and SUV's
2006-11-22 15:01:29
·
answer #1
·
answered by Perplexed 7
·
4⤊
0⤋
You know, one of the hardest parts of my job is to connect Iraq to the war on terror." --George W. Bush, interview with CBS News' Katie Couric, Sept. 6, 2006
I've reminded the prime minister-the American people, Mr. Prime Minister, over the past months that it was not always a given that the United States and America would have a close relationship." George W. Bush, Washington, D.C., June 29, 2006
I think -- tide turning -- see, as I remember -- I was raised in the desert, but tides kind of -- it's easy to see a tide turn -- did I say those words?" --George W. Bush, asked if the tide was turning in Iraq, Washington, D.C., June 14, 2006
"And I want those who are questioning it to step up and explain why all of a sudden a Middle Eastern company is held to a different standard than a Great British company." --George W. Bush, defending a plan to allow a company controlled by the United Arab Emirates to manage ports in the United States, aboard Air Force One, Feb. 21, 2006
Brownie, you're doing a heck of a job." --George W. Bush, to FEMA director Michael Brown, who resigned 10 days later amid criticism over his job performance, Mobile, Ala., Sept. 2, 2005
We look forward to hearing your vision, so we can more better do our job. That's what I'm telling you." --George W. Bush, Gulfport, Miss., Sept. 20, 2005
2006-11-22 23:01:02
·
answer #2
·
answered by gdeach 3
·
3⤊
0⤋
A vote for Kerry is a vote for bad jokes
2006-11-23 14:52:57
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, I'm sick of it.
It's time for the Bush supporters to step up and accept blame for voting for him.
After all, they're all about accountability, right?
2006-11-22 23:33:56
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
Um, since I haven't heard anyone say that in, oh, about a year or so, the answer is no.
Don't you love when right-wingers complain about things that aren't really even problems? No wonder they just got their clock cleaned....
2006-11-22 23:12:09
·
answer #5
·
answered by truth be told 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
Dont blame me, I vote for Al Gore!
2006-11-23 00:58:03
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Nope! It's Clinton's fault.
2006-11-22 23:02:33
·
answer #7
·
answered by Keith P 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
The President's laughing cuz I voted for Nader...
2006-11-22 22:57:48
·
answer #8
·
answered by Netta 3
·
1⤊
2⤋
Shouldn't that be "Don't blame me, I voted for Gore"? What good has John Kerry ever done?
2006-11-22 23:02:05
·
answer #9
·
answered by Babs 7
·
0⤊
3⤋
Anyone who voted for Kerry is to blame.
2006-11-22 23:00:05
·
answer #10
·
answered by ? 5
·
1⤊
4⤋