like "conservative thought refutes science"
The guys on the space shuttle will be shocked when they find out conservative thought powers their rockets
2006-11-22 14:34:13 · 12 answers · asked by gdeach 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I actually meant to say... "attempts to refute" ... but what does that have anything to do with powering the space shuttle?
did you disagree with anything else I said... or do you just go around making fun of everyone that mistypes a statement?
was it really that hard to figure out what I was saying?
do you know what refute means?
do you think conservative thought supports science?
2006-11-22 14:50:10 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why ask a question that you know is only going to get you bashed by people who really have no clue what global warming is?
you can always tell someone has no clue, when they start spewing stuff like....
-check weather patterns for the last 100 years...
-CO2 in the atmosphere 1000's of years ago....
-prove how man has caused..................
-but it happening on mars............
it is called global climate change now, so people don't get too confused by the word "warming".
2006-11-22 14:52:57 · answer #2 · answered by qncyguy21 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes!! I read the whole long garbage post about some Fox News article by some Reverend about whatever they could get scientists to say to debunk Gore. So debunk Gore, and call him an extremist for environmentalism, but that does not refute global warming. Even if reports vary by 400%. That means that temperatures rise 5 degrees to 20 degrees. It's not good, but how bad is it?
2006-11-22 14:37:43 · answer #3 · answered by J G 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Anyone know who is the biggest polluter in Washington State????
It is Mt. St. Helens, by a long shot. I bet you would have guessed Boeing or some other big company but not mother nature....no she would never pollute!
The reason conservatives never believe the "Enviro-Commies" is that they have lied and made up Sh!t for so long....The boy who cried wolf syndrome.
Maybe Global Warming is real, maybe not, but we will never believe people who have a political agenda behind their science.
2006-11-22 14:57:47 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Interestingly, it isn't called global warming any more. It's now called global climate change. What's up with that?
Love Jack
PS Cooljerk, didn't Boeing move to Chicago?
2006-11-22 14:57:58 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Tough call. A lot of questions bring out really retarded answers. A lot of topics bring out retarded questionas as well.
2006-11-22 14:40:39 · answer #6 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
okay. so please research weather patterns over the last 100yrs (at least). google weather records and see the dates that had record highs and lows. i mean seriously chicken little.. the sky isnt falling.. and the earth isnt warming up any more than in the past.. but hey what do weather patterns mean anyway?? i mean if the dems say the world is ending.. then hey.. it must be ending.. and bush must have created its demise..
2006-11-22 14:43:32 · answer #7 · answered by pain_made_me_beautiful 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Is that the same conservative thought that changed the o-rings from asbestos to rubber (Challenger explosion) or do you mean the conservative thought that changed the foam on the fuel tanks from fluorocarbons to e-friendly (Columbia disintegration)?
2006-11-22 14:39:49 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Global warming must be taken seriously because it concerns survival of mankind.
2006-11-22 14:36:16 · answer #9 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
global warming is a big lie...what warmed up the earth after other ice ages...you know when humans weren't around...and yes i do agree with you...
2006-11-22 14:38:18 · answer #10 · answered by turntable 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋