English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Bush's invasion of Iraq is illegal within the framework of the laws of the United States Constitution and the United Nations Charter.

There is evidence leaked by Tony Blairs office that he knew the Bush administration was planning on attacking Iraq, and even more damning, is that Bush was looking for a "legitimate" reason to invade. Hence the birth of "Saddam's Got WMD"

Read more yourself here:
http://www.thefourreasons.org/

Yet Republicans wanted to impeach Clinton for lying about his sex life. I suppose they feel that lying under oath is a much bigger sin than say, lying to your entire country and the UN. Let's not forget how many lives were uselessly lost in Bush's illegal war too. Please tell me what Clinton did that was so much worse than Bush.

2006-11-22 14:27:31 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Government

10 answers

Because there are no justifications for impeachment.

2006-11-22 14:29:27 · answer #1 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 18 4

George W. Bush has done nothing wrong for impeachment. He has not broken any laws, has not violated domestic or international law, and he has never violated the Constitution of the United States of America.
Besides, the Atlanta Hawks will win Back to Back NBA Championship titles before George W. Bush is impeached and since the Hawks are not favored to win an NBA Championship or make the playoffs in 2007, President Bush will Never Be Impeached, even if the Hawks win the NBA Championship in 2008 and 2009.

2006-11-22 15:40:20 · answer #2 · answered by Mr. Knowledgeable VI 7 · 1 1

Hmm. I dunno. i'm not vulnerable to bounce to impeachment. i exchange into against impeaching Clinton, and that i'm not likely in prefer of impeaching Bush. Bush has been an utter failure, yet it relatively is not an excuse to question. That only skill you mustn't vote for him. yet i'm going to verify into Ron Paul's justification, simply by fact he's in many circumstances fantastically considerate approximately those issues. If he's now recommending impeachment, possibly it relatively is properly worth thinking. the place did you hear Paul talk approximately impeachment? i haven't heard that. i've got been following his marketing campaign fantastically heavily, and it relatively is not in the clicking. Frankly, i think of all of us could have heard approximately it if a Republican presidential candidate exchange into speaking approximately impeaching a sitting Republican president. The greater i think of roughly it, the greater I start to think of you're in all probability making this up. It only would not ring real. the clicking could have been throughout this if it have been.

2016-10-12 22:59:23 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Your opinions do not count as conclusive evidence. And, Clinton was impeached for lying to a Grand Jury. At least get a few facts into your goofy assertions.

2006-11-22 14:36:07 · answer #4 · answered by ? 5 · 1 1

Hello, by lying about having sex with Monica, Clinton committed perjury. This is a FELONY. Since Presidents can be impeached for high crimes and misdemeanors. Last I knew, a felony is a worse crime than a misdemeanor.

2006-11-22 14:31:09 · answer #5 · answered by GOPneedsarealconservative 4 · 1 3

I agree with you that Clinton's impeachment was bogus. Bush's would be unreasonable as well. Congress got its shakedown. America woke up. That's all that was necessary.

2006-11-22 14:30:26 · answer #6 · answered by J G 4 · 1 1

he didn't do anything wrong...it is not illegal just because you wish it to be...but you do get your source from a .org so what can we expect...why are you so worried about convicting him...how can someone keep harboring so much hate...Clinton lied under oath...which is impeachable...duh...

2006-11-22 14:33:20 · answer #7 · answered by turntable 6 · 1 1

the republicans don't want to admit that they backed a lying loser . clinton's "crime" was he was too popular. who cares if
he got a little on the side?

2006-11-22 14:34:35 · answer #8 · answered by Queenie Peavey 7 · 2 0

As much as I want George out, it will sap too much of the country's attention and, ultimately, means nothing.

Also, do you really want DeadEye Dick Cheney in charge

2006-11-22 14:31:07 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

Because if they try then he is going to tell on everyone else.......

2006-11-22 14:31:18 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

fedest.com, questions and answers