2006-11-22 13:51:43 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Are you kidding me? He might be the most fiscally irresponsible President in history (at the very least the most fiscally irresponsible Republican president in history). Barry Goldwater is spinning in his grave.
2006-11-22 13:56:12 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
If you use the marking sticks of the state of the economy in America pre-election and now, with the surplus-then, deficit-now situation, you would have to say no, he is not a fiscally responsible president. And judging by how much the US spends on the war in Iraq at the moment, it is only going downhill. The US currently spends more on defense than all the other countries in the world COMBINED!
2006-11-22 22:32:39 · answer #2 · answered by tony w 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
He is NOT a fiscally responsible President.
He blew the entire surplus on tax cuts for the rich. WE had a 250 billion dollar deficit last year. And he has added more to the national debt than any other President in history.
A good question.
2006-11-22 14:04:26 · answer #3 · answered by Villain 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
He doesn't know the meaning of fiscal, he denies responsibility for his actions on a daily basis, and a president is required by the Constitution, to follow Constitutional laws, which for the most part, are ignored or changed for his purpose.
2006-11-22 13:59:40 · answer #4 · answered by Schona 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No.
See Tax Cuts.
See Social Security.
See 100 Billion Dollar Deficit.
See Iraq War.
2006-11-22 13:55:33 · answer #5 · answered by Tofu Jesus 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
whilst Bush II left place of work after 8 years we had a deficit of 8-9 TRILLION money. inspite of the undeniable fact that the projection is that via the time Obama finishes his first term, we are in a position to have a deficit around 20 TRILLION money. So are you going to call the 11-12 TRILLION that Obama provides to the deficit in 4 years the fault of Bush? Or are you going to admit Washington DC is uncontrolled inspite of who's in place of work and we could desire to stomp down on all of them?
2016-10-17 10:23:58 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
NO! Surly you jest. I have heard countless staunch conservative economists say he is one of the most fiscally irresponsible Presidents ever. He spends like a drunken sailor.
2006-11-22 13:57:14 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
do you not remember 911, how do you recover from such an expensive incident as that he did the only thing he could he started a war the best way to stimulate economic growth is a war. what would you have done to save a nation ?
2006-11-22 13:59:37 · answer #8 · answered by treeman 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, he needed to wield the veto to control a Congress run amok. Their appetite for our tax money has been unprecedented. Their levels of spending have been (and remain) despicable.
2006-11-22 15:42:07 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
He is the rent a wreck of our time. He will stand as the worse president that this nation has ever had.....KECK
2006-11-22 13:54:20 · answer #10 · answered by Tneciter 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋