Don't get me wrong, I am a pro-pot person but I am also a smart girl and I see it's downsides as well. I just mean, hypothically, if everyone smoked pot, in moderation, would it cause world peace?
2006-11-22
13:50:59
·
14 answers
·
asked by
Tricksta-Vic
2
in
Society & Culture
➔ Other - Society & Culture
I know it makes some people paranoid and/or lazy, but there are breeds of pot that are better then others. I don't think people would just stay in their basements either. My whole point is that if people smoked they'd have a different perspective on humanity, which is that it can be kind. Anyway, thats just what I was getting at.
2006-11-22
14:32:22 ·
update #1
as long as it didnt run out!
2006-11-22 14:04:37
·
answer #1
·
answered by symbionic1975 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Oh I hesitate to answer this BUT I will. Pot smokers would have to be a heck of alot better than drinkers. They are too paranoid to go out and drive. Munchie consumption would be at a great rise, People who smoke pot do not tend to get violent as drinkers. YES I AM BEING OVERSTATING. I do not smoke, yes I drink ocassionally, but I do not understand the rationality of banning pot and legalizing liquor. The casualties, health and on the street from liquor are far stronger. Maybe someone can explain why one is legal and one is not. Taxes. Laws from the 60's, WHAT! Either legalize both or get rid of both...Absolutely no sense in the way of having one but not the other. JUST MY OPINION. Personally never liked the stuff but not my right to judge who does. Yep it is still illegal, but how many felons would we have if alcohol or tobacco was illegal and we know how harmful that is. As for world peace, really don't know how legalizing it would contribute. But I can assume that smoking the peace pipe is what caused America to become more Non-American-Indian because of the pacificism, and alcohol to the American Indian was its demise because of the ability of alcohol to cause irrationality.
2006-11-22 15:27:19
·
answer #2
·
answered by ஐAldaஐ 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
I don't know about world peace, but there definitely would be a lot less fighting, because everyone would be to laid back to do anything. Think about how often you get mad at someone when your high. I can't think of any time myself.
2006-11-22 13:54:40
·
answer #3
·
answered by Phoebe 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Definitely!
2006-11-22 13:53:00
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
factor taken and study the certainty there's a Marijuana political occasion in existence in Canada yet could additionally exist someplace else and additionally you could desire to run for it or help set others up maybe in Jamaica or Cuba maybe or united statesA. different issues to think approximately are the way it would combine with the eco-friendly occasion and if concepts in line with eco-friendly-Marxism, ordinary eco-friendly occasion concepts and concepts in line with regardless of if or no longer dams ought to exist so fish could desire to be loose to shuttle and the advantages or risks of loose flowing water. to boot elections of monks and such in line with equivalent rights to vote shape become autonomous from that of united states of america generally happening constitutions could desire to help in making the worldwide extra non violent . evaluate additionally how merchandising the U.N. shape in public libraries and point out of each and all the concepts plus close by communities for coaching tolerance and peace marches begining in public libraries and debates in public over books like desirable infantrymen in libraries which contradict peace
2016-10-17 10:23:55
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
no it would not. there would be a huge corporation set up around selling growing and marketing pot, and probably clinics that helped with addictions or whatever. nothing would change peace-wise
2006-11-22 13:55:07
·
answer #6
·
answered by advicemom 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
World peace, and there'd be a McDonalds on every corner.
2006-11-22 13:53:37
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
it makes me paranoid and angry and very confused so definitly not if eveyone was nice the only problems would be health problems which are inevitable not war,greed,murder etc.
2006-11-22 14:25:16
·
answer #8
·
answered by blank 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes
2006-11-22 14:32:26
·
answer #9
·
answered by .....u made me do it 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
no one would ever leave their basements so how could there be fighting
2006-11-22 14:29:32
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋