English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Refer to Indian and Eurasian landplates as shown at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_subcontinent .

2006-11-22 13:00:52 · 9 answers · asked by ambtious parent 1 in Arts & Humanities History

9 answers

Matter of convenience. It is considered a cultural part of Asia. You are technically correct, but it is up to you to change the common usage, here.

2006-11-22 13:18:05 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Geographically, India is seperated from other parts of Asia - 1. Himalays in the North, protects India from the cold Siberian winds, many rivers originated from the himalayas which served great importance to the people and also because of these rivers many civilization emerges like the harappan civilization - Indus river., many religions came into being from the river banks like jainism.
2. Arabian Sea in the West
3. Bay of Bengal in the East
4. Indian ocean in the south
Besides these geographical entities, there has been many cultural interations between the original inhabitants and other ethnic groups, namely: Aryans, Greeks, Romans, Persians, Afghans, Mongols, Arabs, Hunas and the kushanas. Indians has no particular race because of the interactions from centuries, they dont have a common colour because of this very reason.
"Unity in diversity" is what India can be defined as.
From all these, I conclude that India is rightly called a sub continent.

2006-11-22 21:33:16 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

India is not a continent by itself it is part of the large continent of Asia. India is part of the sub continent of South Asia (also know as the Indian Sub Continent. India is a large landmass, that is part of a continent but is considered either geographically or politically as an independent entity. The reference you have provided shows exactly that.

2006-11-22 21:18:58 · answer #3 · answered by Born a Fox 4 · 0 0

I think, if you look at the wikipedia article on Asia, it's because in ancient Europe and Asia, they had Europe, Asia, and Africa as the three continents, as they discovered more about the globe, they named new continents accordingly. So, India wasn't excluded from being a continent by any geographic merit, but rather because that's how it's always been.

2006-11-22 21:15:59 · answer #4 · answered by Sarah C 4 · 0 0

India is not a continent by itself. The land mass is comprised of several countries, thus it is a subcontinent. Just as Canada and the US are subcontinents of North America.

2006-11-22 21:21:54 · answer #5 · answered by Dante_of_Phoenix 2 · 0 2

Although India is rather large it is still connected to the main Asian land mass. While tetonic plates are separated you could use that fact to say part of California is an island.

2006-11-22 21:48:18 · answer #6 · answered by West Coast Nomad 4 · 0 0

See this article on subcontinents
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subcontinent

2006-11-22 21:08:51 · answer #7 · answered by Crash 7 · 1 0

It's part of the Asian continent

2006-11-23 13:55:45 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

not a cont by itself...

2006-11-22 21:15:39 · answer #9 · answered by cork 7 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers