Is it true Barry Bonds, Jason Schimdt, and Omar Vizquel are getting traded to the Anges for Vlad Guerrero and Francisco Rodriguez and 2 Draft picks?
2006-11-22 13:00:15 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Baseball
yes
2006-11-22 13:01:44 · answer #1 · answered by Hermes711 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Not true at all. First of all both Bonds and Schmidt are free agents so the Giants cant trade them as they are not officially members of the team. Equally important is it is against MLB rules to trade draft picks according to the MLB player contract. A player must be signed for 1 full year before his team can trade him (that is why you often hear the term so and so dealt for a player to be named). They can agree to trade a player after he has been signed for a year but cant complete the deal until his 1 year contract anniversary.
2006-11-22 13:55:10 · answer #2 · answered by viphockey4 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Barry Bonds And Jason Schimdt are both free agents. and who in there right mind would do that trade, who wants Bonds
2006-11-22 17:07:04 · answer #3 · answered by pap 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I wish.
Go Giants!
Bonds is actually 42 not 43. The younger the better. If this trade actually were to happen it would be the stupidest trade in the history of MLB for the Angels. For the Giants it would be absolutely awesome.
2006-11-22 13:33:51 · answer #4 · answered by jonnyman 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
trading vlad for a 43 year old bonds, injury prone schmidt, and 40 something vizquel would be the dumbist trade for the angels in history and it will bite them in the but for years to come.. i would be curious if the draft picks are ist rounders though..
2006-11-22 13:15:09 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Barry Bonds and Jason Schmidt are free agents. No team needs to trade for them. They can just sign them and exchange nothing.
Based on this, I would say this rumor is dead wrong.
2006-11-22 13:02:50 · answer #6 · answered by shawn1980 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
NAY! Kemp is the main well liked participant in the pastime good now and Hanley is one in all the two earliest drafted. Reyes and Maggs are great gamers yet you lose too plenty with this deal. you will possibly earnings somewhat on Rodriguez yet you lose lower back on dropping Haren. There purely isn't plenty upside to this deal for you. stroll remote from it.
2016-10-17 10:21:05 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
ummmmm no...where the heck did u hear that? Besides, Bonds and Schmidt are free agents soo they dont need to trade for them.
2006-11-23 01:51:42 · answer #8 · answered by Larry 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, and the Angels would get the bad deal in that, Rodrigues better than schidct, Vlade better than visquel and bonds.
2006-11-23 03:46:25 · answer #9 · answered by Compton,CA 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That would be the dumbest trade in the history of the game.
2006-11-22 15:55:54 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, not at all. Nobody is dumb enough to make that trade, let alone even believe it was true if it happened.
2006-11-22 13:34:45 · answer #11 · answered by johnnydera18 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋