LA is expensive with lot's to do, but very dirty.
SF is more expensive with little to do, but very pretty.
SD has enough to do, is very pretty, and is only 2 hours away from LA. I don't know the cost of living there, but I'd say it's the best deal.
2006-11-22 11:42:11
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
San Diego by far has the lowest cost of living. After that it's arguable--San Francisco has higher rents and real estate than LA, but only by a little bit, and rents in LA are rising 3 times faster than in the San Francisco Bay area. Plus SF is smaller geographically and population wise than LA, which gives LA a much more varied housing mix with some cheap options along with some of the most expensive homes sold in U.S. history.
San Diego rents and mortgages are lower on average, and nearby areas are as well. Plus its cleaner than LA or San Francisco, warm, compact, and right by the beach. Plus as someone else said if you ever get bored, you can hop in your car or on the train and head up to LA for the nightlife/culture.
2014-11-12 19:01:50
·
answer #2
·
answered by Daniel M 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Taking into account housing, utilities, transportation, and health care costs, as well as other expenses - San Diego has the cheapest cost of living. Check out this cool cost of living calculator provided by CNNmoney.com to compare costs of living in different cities:
http://cgi.money.cnn.com/tools/costofliving/costofliving.html?step=form&x=27&y=12
2006-11-22 14:42:53
·
answer #3
·
answered by LB 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Getting outsiders to understand the real vastness of la is a confusing element to do. i don't be attentive to the place you study that fact, even if it extremely would not stick to. There extremely is not any place to stay "out of the city" yet close to adequate tocontinual it extremely is from now on reasonably-priced. you notice, the extra suitable la section extends approximately one hundred miles in each direction from downtown la. In different cities, you have a defined city center, and mightcontinual 10 minutes and be outdoors the city limits. You even have area between cities. in case you look at a satellite tv for pc image of the l. a. section, you notice no longer something yet city and suburbs for thousands of miles. through this, rents are surprisingly plenty the comparable in those components: $1200 or so for a 1BR, approximately $900 for a studio. you will discover fees for much less, yet they are interior the ghetto/extreme crime components. shifting to the outskirts of the l. a. metro section has its very own damaging aspects. With the standard value of gasoline now approximately $4 in step with gallon, any decrease value fees in lease are rapidly swallowed up by utilising commuting fees, besides as a hellish shuttle that sucks out your soul. Such places are Victorville, Hemet, and Lancaster.
2016-11-26 02:05:38
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I had been to those places earlier this year. The highest tax is in San Francisco which is at 8.5%, L.A & San Diego are lower. I think both are the same.
In San Francisco, if you are renting, a studio type would be $1,000+++. Most of these people dont bring their cars downtown because of 2 reasons, it is always hard to park & parking fee is expensive. Even residents of the place dont bring their cars downtown. We parked less than 30 minutes & paid almost $2.00. Even residents dont bring their cars downtown. Riding a bus is accessible compared to all places in California I had been too. As a matter of fact, my cousin had lived here x 30 years without driving a car. You can ride a Muni Bus & transfer again in another one without paying again if you are within the time frame of at least 2 hours. Just keep your bus ticket. It is also accessible by BART. This is the Bay Area Rapid Transit where in you can ride from San Francisco to the Contra Costa County which consists of Oakland, Concord, Antioch, Martinez, La Fayette, Pittsburgh, etc. We had shopped in Daly City for Christmas because parking is not a problem. You can get a studio type here in Daly city for $800.00+++. In Pittsburgh area, a studio type is also $1,000.00++( with parking inside the vicinity ). It is cheaper when you park your car in the street, around $900.00
In LA, the style is that you should know the areas with houses shared by 4-5 people in which they share in the rent. A friend I know at La Fuente pays $250.00 for a very small room but free electricity. Around 5-6 of them stays in the house. Not all areas are accessible to buses. The traffic is very congested.
In San Diego area, the La Jolla area is also expensive. It is where the University of California-San Diego is located. Students also rents a house, around 4-5 of them & pays around $300-400.00 each. If you stay in their dormitory it is more expensive. A friend pays his studio type room for almost $1,000+++. In National City, a 3 bedroom apartment costs my friend $700.00+++. It is just across the Paradise Valley Hospital. Rental depends on the different areas of San Diego.
In El Centro, California, an hour's drive from San Diego, rental is cheaper. However, the climate varies with San Diego, it is a little bit warmer. The house she is renting, 3 bedrooms, 2 comfort rooms, with 2 car garage, big backyard cost her only $900.00.
The technique is to go in the nearby suburbs. My friend's family stays in San Francisco, however, he transferred to Santa Rosa, about 1 hour's drive to San Francisco which has cheaper tax and rental.
In the LA area, nearby places are getting popular. Corona, California is where those who works in LA usually rents at lower rates. The problem is that you have to live earlier if you work in LA.
2006-11-22 12:25:16
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
LA
2006-11-22 12:35:26
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
it wont matter you cant afford any of them
2006-11-22 12:05:12
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋