during the the earier years pf the 20th cen, it was supposed that any woman that participated in the art of discourse would find their lactating skills lacking......this was bullsh*t, as we now know, with our new found experience is now a good time for us males to move over and let the real masters rule?
2006-11-22 11:22:28 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Social Science ➔ Other - Social Science
i do apogalise fur spaallng und grammur but i huv drunk two brtkles of wine....pissed
2006-11-22 11:25:00 · update #1
littlemiss wish i could give you ten thumbs up
2006-11-22 11:53:43 · update #2
it d be cleaner I is a bit pissed to
2006-11-22 11:48:55 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
The main problem for men is that there is no counter force to feminism. Women, already have more personal power through their sexuality. Men have a much higher sex drive, determined by nature, which hands power to women to exploit them. This, they are quite happy to do. It is rather stupid of men, therefore, to have allowed feminists, to achieve on behalf of women, more corporate or institutional power as well. I suppose this really boils down to allowing them to re-structure society through increased equality in the workplace and in the law etc: Attacking any man who doesn't agree with their agenda. So now, they have both personal power, and institutional power.
Regretably, I think that it is the attitude that you display that is part of the problem for men today. If any situation, say in the workplace for example, women will set about changing the rules or lowering the barriers until it does suit them. The trouble is, that men haven't hardened their attitude enough to prevent this happening. They give in to women in the way that have always done; not realising that this misplaced protective mindset is now allowing them to be taken advantage of. So, having allowed women to re-structure society and change the rules to suit themselves, of course, they will appear more able than men.
You will find though, that women will not be as generous to men with their new found power, as men have always been to women. Old wisdoms have been forgotten, and men are going to have to re-learn them the hard way.
Finally, you have to remember, and women take note, that ambitious women, driven by higher testosterone levels, act more like men than women. So, the generality of women will not be best served by their influence. Eg, government policy which is aimed at driving all women out into the workplace when they would rather be at home looking after the children. It is feminist politicians that are driving this policy.
2006-11-23 14:23:33 · answer #2 · answered by Veritas 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It'd be cleaner and international arguments would be settled by countries getting together behind the offending countries back to b itch about them and then be nice as pie to them to their face.
It may be a better place but lets put it this way.. Maggie Thatcher is a woman. Look what she did. I hardly consider this country to be better to live in because of what she did in regards to promoting selfishness amongst the populace.
We should all step aside and let gorillas run everything.. They seem to have it sussed.
2006-11-22 20:48:30 · answer #3 · answered by Martin G 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No I dont think taht if women inherited the earth it would be a better place. I think that potential wise women have and have demonstrated in the past they are just as capable of destruction and wars as men and they are just a power hungry and gready as men. I think its a falacy that women are passive and taht in the hands of women things are quieter. The world would be just as tormented and segregated as it is to day with world leaders being men.
2006-11-23 04:32:01 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Two bottles of wine !
Did you not see that documentary on BBC2 last night ?
Who said we ever had possession of it in the first place to bequeath it to women.
Who ever inherits it has got one hell of a dry cleaning bill !
2006-11-22 19:41:19 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
If there are any meek women out there...?
Matthew 5:5 Blessed [are] the meek: for they shall inherit the earth.
2006-11-22 19:45:34 · answer #6 · answered by Matthew. 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Huh are you insane? First of all NO. Second of all if they did it the population would go down. An idiot thought of that because she wanted to. NO FACTS SUPPORTED
BTW the men give the seeds so ha!
2006-11-22 19:39:33 · answer #7 · answered by Treebark12002 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Of Course!
2006-11-22 19:30:09 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
in aswer 2 de dittional deetails NICE..Try not to spill any... Also de thirst qwestion was a bit hard but actually weer all SKREWD
2006-11-22 20:31:49 · answer #9 · answered by Vinny 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Are you saying that they don't already rule?
When was this decided?
If women do not give birth there is no population, so they already have the power
2006-11-22 19:36:25 · answer #10 · answered by JAYFIRE 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋