English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

9 answers

Fantastic question! Well, let's see:
One fluorescent bulb will save an average of about 1000W a day. If cars ran on electricity, as some do, that would save the equivalent of about 5HP in practical terms. A car requires an average of 20 HP to move along in average traffic, all day long. So, really, if you replace four bulbs in your house with fluorescents, it's as if one car has been taken off the road. You could also say, one fluorescent lamp replaces a quarter car.
This also holds true when you do the calculation on the grounds of energy production through fossil fuels, which is what most countries do. Running four fluorescents in your house will save one car's worth of fuel consumption in commuter traffic per day. You can also calculate this via your electricity bill. The savings you achieve by running fluorescents will very roughly equal the price you would have to pay for the amount of diesel fuel which would otherwise have been burnt in the power plant making the electricity for regular bulbs. That amount of diesel fuel is available for something else then.
Happy now?

2006-11-22 10:54:27 · answer #1 · answered by Tahini Classic 7 · 0 0

Rosie, with connection with the enslavement remark, he does have a ingredient. Your unique query means which you worry approximately international warming, you think of that's a challenge, and you're actually thinking what you're able to do approximately it. i'm hoping it particularly is superb because of the undeniable fact that seems to be your questioning superb now. Now enable's talk hypothetically for a minute. enable's say we are actually in a era of worldwide cooling. and via extra learn we discover that this era of cooling is using decreased image voltaic pastime and sunspot pastime mixed with a 30 12 months cool part of the Pacific Decadal Oscillation? Now enable's quickly forward to 2020 the place international temperatures are slowly occurring and are predicted to proceed a downward cooling vogue till a minimum of 2050. this is going to reason great hassle on mankind, plenty extra beneficial than any warming would have. So now here we are in 2020 and we glance back at 2009 and attempt to determine why you theory you had to decrease CO2 or in spite of else guy became doing interior the perception that guy became doing quite some the warming the planet whilst all alongside mom nature had administration of (maximum of) the climate merely like continually. then you ought to examine the style you got here to that erroneous perception. it is the place enslavement comes into play lower back. Enslavement is getting somebody to persist with a doctrine to the comprehensive ingredient appropriate to the guy dictating the doctrine. This many times sounds sinister on the commencing up look, yet once you studied history in any respect you will hit upon the line to hell affected via nicely which capacity human beings and concepts. And merely notice, that between the features of a doctrine of this nature is it particularly is presented as reliable and superb or perhaps ethical and any opposite opinion is something to be reviled. additionally notice that technological know-how would not artwork in that way. interior the tip, i'm now not asserting it is real for you and climate replace, yet you would be niave to now not a minimum of provide it somewhat severe theory approximately if now not on your modern reason however the style you elect to persist with next reasons. Be self reliant, considerate, curious and purpose.

2016-12-17 14:43:06 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Don't know specifically about cars; it's about emissions from utility companies.

The less energy we use, the less energy electric utilities must generate, and less demand means fewer greenhouse gas emissions. If homeowners change just one bulb to an Energy Star qualified bulb they will prevent the release of more than 450 pounds of greenhouse gas emissions.

2006-11-22 09:55:48 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Light bulbs are not replacements for cars.

2006-11-22 09:53:43 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

It's an invalid apples and onions questions. Flourescents and automobiles do not have the same function so it will not replace any

2006-11-22 09:58:40 · answer #5 · answered by Sid B 6 · 0 0

What are you trying to say what does the two have in common

2006-11-22 11:48:24 · answer #6 · answered by Douglas R 4 · 0 0

Infinitesimal, or can be rounded off to near zero.

2006-11-22 12:43:15 · answer #7 · answered by Mr.Wise 6 · 0 0

huh?

2006-11-22 09:53:02 · answer #8 · answered by dumpsterdd90 5 · 0 0

What are you asking here?????????

2006-11-22 09:55:08 · answer #9 · answered by Silverstang 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers