At the end of this season there is very little chance that there won't be at least a few teams with 11-1 records and possibly a second team with undefeated. Yet only two teams will have a chance at winning the National Title. There will undoubtebly be multiple teams not even getting a chance at the National Title regardless of their remarkable seasons. Why not have a 16 team playoff, 4 weeks that end on the same day the National Title would always be held. It would mean more money from ticket sales for the NCAA and there would be little if any question about who deserved to be crowned National Champion. Tell me what you think.
2006-11-22 09:10:17 · 13 answers · asked by Alex 3 in Sports ➔ Football (American)
Yes they should. 8 teams. That would give 3 rounds of games. Have the first round at the same time the regular bowl games are played. Each one of the playoff games should be bowl games as well. It would only go two extra weeks (and that for 4 teams.) The winning team would get money from 3 bowl games, the 2nd place team would have won 2. Good money for good teams and you still have all the "lesser" bowl games as well. It works for everyone. I would say enough money would come in from the last two rounds to make it very profitble for all involved.
2006-11-24 06:00:05 · answer #1 · answered by BigDan73 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
this has been the same arguement for the like the last 10 years at least, and inless you get the number 1 and 2 team play every year fro it then i really think its needed, what is with some years 1 and 3 play that is no good and this year my be 1 and 2 but they already played once so y not give some one else a shot at number 1 but then again you might not have 1 and 2 witch it should alwayz be, i think there should be a 10 team play off if you make the top ten then you get a shot, and team 1 and 2 should get a by like the nfl, and the higher ranked team get home feild, it will prob never happen in our life time if ever, but i think they should, would make it more exicting less contruvericy that way and then teams like usc ND florida or ark. will have a chance to play for it,
2006-11-22 09:44:38 · answer #2 · answered by dom_parnell 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes...the BCS rankings based way too much on popularity...everyone should have a chance to play in the championship and with the BCS ranking only the top 2 teams do. And we all the top two teams are always beatable so why not have a playoff and give another team a chance of an exciting upset.
2006-11-22 10:41:40 · answer #3 · answered by Cash 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ohio State won't even attain the nationwide Championship interest, much less win it. West Virginia won't lose to Uconn or Pitt. So, till the BCS extremely has a dying desire, the Mountaineers will finally end up enjoying for the nationwide Championship. If Kansas beat Missouri, and Oklahoma beat Kansas, THEN Ohio State has a case, yet for some reason i don't see Kansas prevailing the next day.
2016-12-29 08:36:16 · answer #4 · answered by osuch 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, Definitely. There are so many one or two, or maybe even 3 loss teams that could win. That would make no more split titles.
2006-11-23 03:44:15 · answer #5 · answered by B-rian B 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, they should just give it to the Spartans, they are way better than every team in the league.
2006-11-22 11:07:51 · answer #6 · answered by Sparty 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I completely agree with you!!! The BCS rating scale is horrible!!!
This happens every year and I don't understand why they haven't changed to a bracket system???
GO GATORS!!
2006-11-22 09:32:11 · answer #7 · answered by C-Rod1417 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
NO, most of the time the BCS works. All they need is a plus one game if they need it.
2006-11-22 09:30:15 · answer #8 · answered by Zack Stewart 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I completely agree, and have said they should do that for the past few years.
2006-11-22 09:17:46 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes they should...but they wont because of all the bowl and the money that each school is getting
2006-11-22 09:20:07 · answer #10 · answered by nas88car300 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋