2006-11-22 08:49:54 · 9 answers · asked by miamidolphins276 1 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Music
Even though I am not a big listener to either I think Korn is really cool.
2006-11-22 08:52:04 · answer #1 · answered by Frank R 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
There are good qualities about each band.
KoRn- Same singer since the beginning (unless you consider when they called themselves LAPD the beginning. That is pre Jonathan Davis though)
Adema- Their self-titled first album was absolutely awesome (at the time, they were almost rap-rockish which was still in.)
KoRn- Longevity. Korn has been around since 1994, when they came out with their first record, which was self-titled.
Adema- Even after the change in singers, they are still trying to truck on. They changed labels to a metal label, and were making appearances at metal festivals. They didn't stick to the same sound they had been trying to do with Marky Chavez, Jonathan's half brother.
Every band has some quality that makes them good and unique.
2006-11-26 02:00:22 · answer #2 · answered by pomme_de_sangstl 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Korn is about three levels higher than Adema. Korn vs. Godsmack. Korn vs. Disturbed. Those are tough. Korn vs. Adema, not even a contest.
2006-11-22 17:18:30 · answer #3 · answered by mattapan26 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Korn
2006-11-22 16:51:33 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Korn, hands down, Adema's only claim to fame is that jon davis' little brother sang for them at one time.
2006-11-22 16:52:12 · answer #5 · answered by Mike Honcho 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Korn.
2006-11-22 16:51:04 · answer #6 · answered by gonicki31 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
korn
2006-11-22 16:56:42 · answer #7 · answered by Dink 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i think korn is defintely more reputable and talented.
2006-11-22 16:51:13 · answer #8 · answered by m21 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Either they both suck!
2006-11-22 16:51:52 · answer #9 · answered by SWORD LI 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋