Clinton. He has a far more engaging personality, and is considerably more intelligent. His personal ethics may not be the best, but as a diplomat I would much rather be represented by him than George Bush.
2006-11-22 07:54:53
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
3⤋
I'd choose Clinton over bush and here's why. Clinton is only guilty of lying about getting a ******** from a GOP hooker. While bush is busy stealing from us and those in Iraq, sort of like what the nazi's did to the Jews and the Germans. Though you are probably just as greedy and can't see. In answer to your points of view: 1: bush's faith is so strong he had to become a reborn christian to claim that status. 2: bush wouldn't give you the truth if his life depended on it, he'd plead the fifth or since you believe so strongly he'd probably sell you a dried up oil well.. 3: Yes he'd serve with as much passion as he could fit in his overseas accounts, he ducked out of the service and wasn't even in a time of war, what a retard. If only the rest of our military could sellect where they want to serve I wonder how many would be in Iraq. 4: Well he might care about his family though I'm sorry for his wife, a man who is in bed by nine leaving her to the strip clubs and stuffing money down young mens jocks can't be all good. Well at least we know where some of our tax dollars are going anyway and I'm sure the stripers are glad of it. 5: He's such a strong leader and team player that the GOP hates him and most of his voters as well though there are a few who just can't admit he's worthless.
2016-05-22 18:01:49
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Definitely Bill Clinton. He was a diplomat and knew how to practice the fine art of diplomacy. Bush is just a "good old boy" from the sticks and his idea of diplomacy is to pat someone on the back and say "howdy." What a clown. No wonder we've lost most of our friends in the world.
2006-11-22 08:09:09
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
There's a difference between renting out the Lincoln bedroom for fun & profit to the Chinese and being diplomatic friend.
Look at it from another point of view. Which leader would be safe without bodyguards. The one who panders to a possible enemy or the one who stands up to them?
Answer: former President Bill Clinton
2006-11-22 07:56:59
·
answer #4
·
answered by Rich B 5
·
3⤊
2⤋
When Clinton went over seas crowds will gather in the thousands to cheer and listen to him,when Bush travels over seas thousands show up to protest his policy..and the security services of those countries spend millions to protect him..!!
Clinton for obvious reasons...I
2006-11-22 08:10:52
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
100% Bill Clinton, at least he showed diplomatic skills- talking with people from the other side of issues instead of blocking them out on principle.
2006-11-22 23:08:35
·
answer #6
·
answered by tony w 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
"Clinton Diplomacy" - A contradiction of terms.
2006-11-22 11:55:03
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Since the terrorists find motivation to commit their acts solely, and only because of Bush, I pick Clinton.
2006-11-22 07:55:21
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
Bill Clinton! At least he has some communication and diplomatic skills. With the other clown I would be afraid for my life in Anaheim , Ca.
2006-11-22 07:56:21
·
answer #9
·
answered by Chuck P 3
·
4⤊
3⤋
Hands down Clinton has been one of the most diplomatic American presidents in the past fifty years.
2006-11-22 07:54:53
·
answer #10
·
answered by neutral 2
·
5⤊
2⤋