English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Who is responsible for the current television programming, which is almost completely lacking in substance, ethical value, and moral guidance?

And...

Poorly managed television has become one of the most crucial problems to affiliated richness in billions of American households.

Is this sentence alright? Does it make sense? How should I reword this?

Thank You!

2006-11-22 07:23:54 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Education & Reference Higher Education (University +)

6 answers

Try:

Someone must take responsibility for current television programming, which is almost completely lacking in substance, ethical value, and moral guidance.
or
We must take responsibility for current television programming, which is almost completely lacking in substance, ethical value, and moral guidance.

And... (although your intention here is much less clear)

Poorly-managed television and it's affiliated, inflated affluence has become one of the most crucial problems to billions of American households.

2006-11-22 08:02:21 · answer #1 · answered by David A 7 · 0 0

Poorly managed television has become one of the most crucial problems to affiliated richness in billions of American households. While most believe money hungry broadasting companies are responsible for the current television programming, which is almost completely lacking in substance, ethical value, and moral guidance they are simply answering to the demands of the public, who are ultimately responsible. They get what they ask for.

2006-11-22 07:58:34 · answer #2 · answered by fancyname 6 · 0 0

Current television programming lacks substance, ethical value, and moral guidance and one wonders who is in charge.

The second sentence does not make sense as i cannot figure out what you are trying to say. What affiliated richness and there are not billions of us only millions.

2006-11-22 07:35:22 · answer #3 · answered by elaeblue 7 · 0 0

I think, your second sentence is a little difficult to understand, especially the "richness in billions of...." part.

How about:

Current television programming, which lacks substance and standard destroys ethics and moral of those who watch.

My thinking is, television program does not have moral, but people do. Lack of quality in tv programming is affecting the psyche of the television watchers. I just stated that way instead. Sort of cause and effect type of thinking. To say "billions of" you need something to back that up.

2006-11-22 07:36:12 · answer #4 · answered by tkquestion 7 · 0 0

Responsibility for current television programming's lack of substance, ethical value, and moral guidance is one of question.


I don't know...just a suggestion.

2006-11-22 07:30:47 · answer #5 · answered by Lauren B 1 · 0 0

Gruen's skill to create an functional point of view as nicely as his use of strategic sentence shape and internet site of activities is his key to conserving the reader's activity.

2016-10-04 06:23:37 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers