So, who has heard that the book is being withdrawn and destroyed and the airing of the interview has been cancelled? What are your opinions?
2006-11-22 04:43:38 · 23 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Media & Journalism
I hope someone comes along and chops off his head. That's what I really feel.
2006-11-22 04:46:23 · answer #1 · answered by Peach 5 · 5⤊ 1⤋
Unfortunate crime but as a person found innocent by a jury he's not barred from writing this theoretical book (which does not contain a confession). Money was probably the motivation in writing the book as there is a civil suit debt and a need to provide an inheritance for his children etc. Trial attorney's Cochran, Marcia and Darden wrote their own books and received millions.
A few things that the jury may have considered:
-The investigator who found the glove later committed PERJURY regarding his racist comments.
- Another investigator took a vial sample of OJ's blood from the lab and carried it INTO the crime scene.
- The glove DID NOT fit OJ's hand.
- There never was the amount of blood on OJ's body, clothes, house or car CONSISTENT with someone who had committed that crime in person..
- The murder weapon was NEVER connected to him or found.
- The jury was taken to visit OJ's house and DID NOT see a large blood trail.
- There were no witnesses to the actual crime.
- Likely the jury found him innocent because there was a LACK of real evidence to convict.
Some may disagree with the verdict but it's unfair for them to blatantly say with a certainty that this man is guilty.
At times the general content of a book and sometimes the title is controlled by a publisher which you must agree to if you want to get the contract.
2006-11-24 07:03:09 · answer #2 · answered by sunshine25 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Great. A slimeball like OJ Simpson should not profit from his miss-deeds. Has anyone else in sports fallen so far from grace?
2006-11-22 15:42:34 · answer #3 · answered by Bruster1 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It will just create more hype and more people will want to read it. If the networks and publishers were sincere in their cancellations, they would not have allowed it in the first place.
The whole thing is a gong show.
2006-11-22 12:46:57 · answer #4 · answered by artisticallyderanged 4 · 4⤊ 0⤋
I think he should be deported to some disease stricken third world country With nothing but his new book and a T-shirt made out of Shake and Bake Pork Chops.
2006-11-22 14:00:44 · answer #5 · answered by Rocky The Fearless 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I'm pleased that it happened. Why? I believe the public is tired of OJ shennigans
2006-11-22 12:46:44 · answer #6 · answered by chuck h 5 · 6⤊ 0⤋
It was a just decision...at last. The court of public opinion rules. Thousand of good and decent people did that! They made a difference.
2006-11-22 12:55:18 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
I think its great. In my mind he is the killer.
Secondly what man would have the audacity to show that he has a murderous capability. Writing a book saying how it is he would have killed someone. For me i think he should Get charges of premeditaded murder. For having those thoughts in his head.
2006-11-22 13:35:44 · answer #8 · answered by Adrian R 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I hadn't heard that, but it doesn't suprise me.
The ramifications of exploiting the Double-Jeapordy law by a celebrity could be enough to force congress to change it.
2006-11-22 12:52:59 · answer #9 · answered by jirstan2 4 · 4⤊ 0⤋
I'm glad that piece of crap doesn't get to benefit from murdering his ex wife and Ron Goldman. What a scum bad for even considering profiting from this!!!!
2006-11-22 12:50:09 · answer #10 · answered by FaerieWhings 7 · 4⤊ 1⤋
I don't think it's right for him to make money out of his murdered wife. It has been traumatizing her family for years now, and just when they've decided to put it behind now, he brought it up again. And what's more, it's describing how he would've killed her. How would you feel if you're her family?
2006-11-22 12:57:45 · answer #11 · answered by Hanna 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋