how can I discuss my new theory on magnetism(physics) to scientist of world and publish it.?

Question

I can prove that domain theory in magnetism is wrong and it can be modified also concept of lines of force is also wrong by an expariment and logic.

Answer 1

PLEASE don't just send it around to physics departments. We get enough quacks doing that as it is.

Here's what you do. Write up your theory succinctly and with all supporting evidence and math, and submit it to the Physical Review Letters. Here is their submission page.

http://authors.aps.org/ESUB/

They will review your paper and see if it's worth sending on to their editors. If they reject it out of hand, you probably have major misconceptions in your ideas that need to be fixed. If they send it on to the editors, you may have a shot - they will send it to someone in the field, an annoymous reviewer, to get their opinions, at which point they will either accept it for publication, reject it, or ask you to fix it in some way before it is accepted.

Or, you could submit an abstract to an upcoming APS (American Physical Society) meeting. They usually have at least one forum at the meeting for 'different' ideas - you might have more luck there than submitting to a journal.

Answer 2

I think you need to learn more about electromagnetism first before going off trying to change the world of physics. Domain theory is highly derivative, having as much to do with solid state physics as magnetism, and "lines of force" is a picture book description suitable for high school students that pertains to the interaction of the magnetic field on a magnetic dipole. These are not starting points for a radical new fundamental theory. Also, your reference to a theory of "magnetism" suggests a magneto-static description, betraying a lack of appreciation of the electric field, an intrinsic component of any fundamental dynamical theory involving magnetism.

So, you now have a choice: Become a student of physics, pursue some other interest, or become yet one more Internet crackpot to amuse the masses.

Answer 3

Yeah, I'm sure you can prove the most complete and most accurate theory in physics wrong.

If you were serious you wouldn't be talking about it here, and you'd know what to do, since all other scientists seem to know what to do.
Oh, and I don't see how scientists will believe you when you can't even spell experiment right or have correct punctuation and grammar.

Answer 4

First you should write your theory. Then have someone close to you read it as a form of peer review. This way you ensure your theory will be up to the standards of a scholar. Then, you should send a copy of your research to The Canadian Journal of Physics (http://pubs.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/cgi-bin/rp/rp2_desc_e?cjp) you can even email it to them. After it goes through their peer review process, it will be published.

Answer 5

it's called a doctorate degree and a thesis... you can get published if you do substantial research in graduate school under the tutelage of an advisor.

Answer 6

Find some email adresses of physicists, send them your proof. If there's anything to it, they'll let you know.

Answer 7

Attend grad school.