English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

besides the bloodbaths.

2006-11-22 02:53:08 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

14 answers

you don't think the bloodbaths are a big enough difference?

2006-11-22 02:58:10 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Besides the bloodbaths ?
Well that's the answer. Why ask something and choose to ignore the truth ?!?!

Does Barney and Murder on TV influence our children ?
Yes, they both do, but if you remove the 'bloodbath' then they're the same ..right ?!?
Do you now see the flaw in that type of reasoning ????

2006-11-22 02:59:32 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Q: What's the difference between a corrupt politician in Africa and one in England or the US?

A: My opinion is that they are all basically the same.

2006-11-22 02:58:22 · answer #3 · answered by frogmaster 2 · 0 0

The one in Africa is probably just not as slick.

It is true, however, that the method of government in the US and England compared to some governments in Africa (dictatorships) keeps some corruption in check.

s

2006-11-22 02:59:40 · answer #4 · answered by Serendipity 7 · 0 0

possibly Jesus' followers pronounced that, yet i do no longer think of Jesus himself pronounced that. He gave the impression to be for all. i think of he certainly grew to become extensive-unfold by utilising no longer being picky (that's the hallmark of a frontrunner, and it extremely is continuously). Corrupt politicians are only for on the instant. they have an exceedingly undesirable call day after today. The accountability thrust upon them is shattered. they are weaklings. i discover your questioning to be surprisingly thrilling, even if.

2016-11-26 01:14:01 · answer #5 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

Chances are that the one in Africa is making less money than one in England or US.

2006-11-22 02:56:52 · answer #6 · answered by jay s 4 · 1 0

Nothing...not even the bloodbaths. US politicans just have more resources to pawn it off onto somebody else.

2006-11-22 02:56:49 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

None,other than we can still fight back until they take away our rights to own a gun and we could lose that right after the 2008 elections and if the Democrats take more control of both houses of congress and an anti-gun president takes office (from any party).

2006-11-22 03:08:17 · answer #8 · answered by Ralph T 7 · 0 1

None...HOW corrupt they are depends on what kind of government they're running....dictators usually don't have the self-policing that goes on in a democracy.

2006-11-22 03:01:59 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Geography?

2006-11-22 02:56:50 · answer #10 · answered by Handy man 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers