should be held respsonsible for his decision to let the man out, and charged with manslaughter. This psycho was allowed out for 1 hour, went into a park and murdered a man riding his bike, he obviously isnt stable and is very disturbed. If the psychiatrist is put in prison himself this will deter other psychiatrists and parole officers who let prisoners out of prison early on parole think twice. The amount of murders that happen by people out on parole is disgusting. Do these people not realise that the general publics lives are in their hands and that letting these people out early is dangerous?
2006-11-22 01:32:52 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
Although thats a fair point Ron J. I dont really care if there is a thousand good turnouts from prison (which there isnt) If 1 innocent person is murdered because of a foul up on a psychiatriss behalf they should get more than a slap on the wrist as theyb are completely responsible for not doing there job right. If someone in a different job such as construction was to do something without thinking it through such as authorising scaffolding and the that fll they would get charged with manslaughter. The psychiatrist was aware of the prisoners prior murders and still let him out. Your right the prisons are full, so dont inprison him, hang him instead!
2006-11-22 01:54:51 · update #1
I wont be next Jim ex marine cos I aint someone who pretends to be able to do a job and then allow people to get murdered.
2006-11-22 02:14:24 · update #2
The problem is much more complex and can't be solved by putting more people in prison. Factors that determine when a person is released: Prison overcrowding, sentencing guidelines, parole board or special review board decisions, etc. None of these factors can be controlled by a psychiatrists or parole officer, and rarely do psychiatrists or parole officers have a say in the matter. What your fail to mention is all the successful releases, don't let a few bad apples paint a negative picture of the process as a whole.
2006-11-22 01:43:11 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
questions like this always amaze me and the answers are always worse, It this man was on trial and this psychiatrist said a man was unfit for the general public, then you would have said I sure am glad this man is locked up and we are safe, so the man spends his whole life in prison and has not shown any strange or abhorrent actions. and is finally released we wonder if he or she was a danger from the beginning, I question how much trust should we put in our psychiatrist? it is pretty obvious they don't know, and no one yet has found out how or why the human mind works, so I say don't convict on the words of a psychiatrist. nor release anyone until they prove their sanity. and that could be done by letting them interact with others in the institution where they are confined, After reading your last part I agree hang them and you and I may be next, how will you feel then?
2006-11-22 01:57:30 · answer #2 · answered by jim ex marine offi, 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, i've got been in a psych scientific institution, each door immediately locks at the back of you, and you will have a undeniable key to get in. Someones continually conscious, and the cameras are action detected, the slightest circulate and that they be attentive to, plus there is somebody continually on the table. effective question nonetheless =-)
2016-11-26 01:06:27 · answer #3 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think he should be held responsible because it was like putting a loaded gun in the wrong hands and the doctor had to know that.
2006-11-22 01:37:38 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Just think of the people who live in the area.
i live within 10 Min's of the hospital
2006-11-22 01:36:40 · answer #5 · answered by Bella 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋