English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I heard saw 3 was a waste of time. i didnt get to see the movie yet and i just wanted to know from all the people that already seen is what you think about it. i enjoyed the first two but i just didnt get around to the third.

2006-11-22 01:01:12 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music Movies

9 answers

This movie, as always with the previous Saw installments, has once again proved to be worthwhile. The set-ups were great, the torture devices and scenes were unimaginable with NO limits whatsoever, and the ingenious traps Jigsaw puts on all of his victims were unbelievable. Saw 3 will keep you wondering what will be the outcome of the end. No doubt did this movie impress me and hopefully Saw fans as well. Now, as a warning, this movie did have some EXTREMELY sickening scenes with constant groans from audience in theater, but will nonetheless please its viewers. I highly recommend fans, and anyone who loves a good gross-out horror movie buff to see this latest Saw installment.

2006-11-22 02:01:25 · answer #1 · answered by yu3se6 6 · 0 0

If you enjoyed the first two, you will enjoy this one. I believe that the traps are more ingenious than the ones in Saw 1 and 2. In terms of the film itself, it sort of combined elements from both Saw 1 and 2, and then went in its own direction from there. But yes, it is quite gory, so it is not for the weak-of-stomach.

2006-11-25 07:25:54 · answer #2 · answered by Owen 1 · 0 0

In my opinion, from the Saw-Trilogy the first one was the best...I've seen all three parts of it.

You know, I don't know if you've seen the Matrix-Trilogy,but the from there the first part was the best and as you take a look at series movies, you can acknowledge that the first is always the best.

2006-11-22 01:11:09 · answer #3 · answered by djsea87 2 · 0 0

i always go to IMDB.com to find out the rating on the movie before i take a chance of wasting my time.

i think saw 3 was amazing.. u definitly had to see the first 2 though to really get it.. it wont be a waste of ur time! if you like blood and gore ..then its the movie to see! have fun

2006-11-22 01:11:21 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

a unfavourable approach- 8.5/10 staggering somewhat. i think of yet another viewing could convey it as much as a 9 the girl With The Dragon Tattoo ( Swedish version) 8/10 wonderful- I hate to work out women folk getting raped nonetheless conflict Horse- 9/10 stellar action picture making- can not watch for Tuesday to get it on dvd BQ2- I observed the devil- 8/10 The Koreans recognize a thank you to make revenge action pictures! maybe that equipped up hostility is from residing next to the evil North Korean regime.

2016-10-17 09:27:14 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Saw 3 was not as good as 2 (which is my favorite), but it certainly has that Saw flare.

2006-11-22 01:38:43 · answer #6 · answered by Bob Smith 5 · 0 0

i think its brilliant, its the best one out of all three. u hav to see the other two first tho.

dont see it if u hav a weak stomach tho, it is the most goriest film ever!

2006-11-22 01:04:17 · answer #7 · answered by ami 2 · 0 0

not seen it yet but its meant to b great so im definetley gonna

2006-11-22 01:19:55 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

no it was very very very boring

2006-11-22 01:10:16 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers