English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

8 answers

The Big Bang theory does have a good amount of evidence behind it. So we’ll take a look at the three biggies.

a) Cosmological Redshift: We can use spectroscopy to determine the rate at which galaxies are moving away from us. Additionally, since it takes light time to travel, the further away we look, the further back in time we are looking.

What we find, is that all galaxies in the universe are moving away from us. The further they are, the faster they’re moving away. So if we play the whole thing in reverse, all the galaxies will come back together at a single point in time. This point in time is what we call the Big Bang.

b) The Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB): Figuring that if you played everything back in time like this that all that energy would be crammed into a smaller space, that means the temperature would go up. And also since galaxies couldn’t have formed yet, we’d expect a gaseous sort of universe early on. As I discussed earlier, hot dense gasses emit photons at a peak wavelength corresponding to their temperature. Unfortunately, since things were so dense, photons couldn’t get very far.

However, with the available information, astronomers were able to determine at what density and time, photons would finally be able to get far enough that we could observe them. This is called the “surface of last scattering” and has a very specific temperature. So we should be able to look for photons with energy (wavelength) corresponding to that temperature.

But due to redshift, they will appear at a different wavelength. This radiation should appear from every direction. This was a prediction made by the Big Bang theory that was later confirmed by Penzias and Wilson who stumbled on it accidentally!

No other theory of the universe has ever been able to make such a profound prediction to the degree of accuracy the Big Bang did in this instance. Making such amazing predictions is one of the highlights of a good theory. None before or since have ever been able to pull off such a feat.

But the successes of the CMB prediction don’t stop there. Another important piece of the puzzle lies in that the CMB couldn’t be completely even. If it were, then galaxies couldn’t form since there would be no “seeds” with higher mass and thus a stronger gravitational pull to form around.

Thus, the Big Bang theory had to predict that the CMB would not be completely homogeneous. It should have some variations to it, and those variations would have to be of a specific size in order to get the universe we see today.

Early results for the Big Bang didn’t look too good for this prediction and threatened to sink the whole ship. However, the devices used were not actually sensitive enough to pick up these minute variations. But recently, with the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP), these perturbations have been discovered precisely as predicted.

Score two strong predictions for the Big Bang. Zero for any others.

c) Distribution of Elements: With the conceptual framework intact thanks to the first point, it was also possible to calculate how much of each element should be formed in the initial event. It should be obvious that, given a bunch of protons, electrons, and neutrons, hydrogen should be the easiest to form. Indeed, stick a proton and an electron in a room together and they’ll automatically hook up due to their magnetic attractions.

Additionally, with such high energies, it would be possible to fuse some of this hydrogen into helium and even a little bit of heavier elements. Since astronomers had a good handle on the energies, it was possible to calculate how much of each there should be. If that number didn’t match up with observations, the Big Bang theory would be shot.

Fortunately, the predictions do match up pretty closely. I stated a value earlier of 80% hydrogen, 20% helium, and neglected the rest since it would be statistically insignificant. In the universe today, we observe 75% hydrogen, 24% helium, and 1% everything else. This discrepancy is easily accounted for by nearly 14 billion years of stars cooking hydrogen into helium and other heavier elements.

So there’s three major pieces of evidence for the Big Bang, any one of which, if it had turned out any other way, would completely discredit the theory. Fortunately for the Big Bang, it has passed all of those tests, and not a single other theory has yet been able to adequately explain such things, or many anywhere near as profound of predictions (or any successful predictions for that matter). This is why the Big Bang stands alone as the premiere theory in cosmology today.

Will it happen again??? We cannot tell for sure because as far as we are concerned space and time both started at the Big Bang and therefore there was nothing before it. We can speculate in meta-physics or in religion about what was before the Big Bang, but again, we cannot use science to tell anything about it as physics as we understand it breaks down at that point.

2006-11-21 23:03:00 · answer #1 · answered by Sporadic 3 · 0 0

Within the few next years you will have a more clear answer. CERN is constructing a new particle accelerator, with that accelerator scientist hope to find the Higgs particle. This particle is responsible for the energy of our expanding universe, the energy the drives the expension. So if we find the particle, the big bang would be SO WRONG and the big crush would be bullcrap. Alan gruth would be right, and steven hawking, wrong...;)

2006-11-22 01:24:12 · answer #2 · answered by CarpeDiem 1 · 0 0

No! It never happened. It is just a theory. Who can sufficiently explain a universe without space before the big bang? Who has satisfactorily explained why the universe should seemingly accelerate as it expands? Sensible logic is that the big bang could only have occurred in space and then we have the problem of matter escaping infinite gravity singularity. The universe was created and is beyond human comprehension due to our limited perception.

2006-11-21 22:44:00 · answer #3 · answered by St Lusakan 3 · 0 2

well big bang is just a theory.and the universe is expanding now.
well there is a chance for such a thing to happen

2006-11-21 23:20:59 · answer #4 · answered by xxxxxxxx 1 · 0 0

it is as yet the best theory about the creation of the universe, and the same theory also estimates that it is a single event, that will not be repeated in this universe, and that this universe will slowly disperse and become thinner, larger and colder for ever

2006-11-22 00:51:51 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

at the start, no longer the worldwide, however the Universe is increasing. Secondly, we don't recognize for specific no count number if the BB occurred in any respect, in line with threat it began from 2 brans touch, in line with threat the universe is a extensive wave. There are some circumstances for the tip of the Universe. certainly one of them is, of course, the super shrink, which i think of you have stated. yet no one knows that for specific. in line with threat the Universe will shop increasing perpetually, in line with threat no longer :D

2016-10-04 05:59:05 · answer #6 · answered by Erika 4 · 0 0

no we are heading for a big crunch
or a forever expaning to infinity universe

2006-11-21 22:52:41 · answer #7 · answered by catweazle 5 · 0 0

yes it did happen and it will happen again

2006-11-22 03:14:36 · answer #8 · answered by genius sonia 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers