English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

12 answers

Something would have gone wrong with apes, resulting human evolution.

2006-11-22 00:18:02 · answer #1 · answered by dSolver 3 · 0 1

The question has already been answered by some reasonable persons. I want to elaborate on a particular issue though. One said if we evolved from apes then present day apes could have human babies as a mutation. Could, maybe, but the apes of present day are not the ancestor both modern apes and man share. Is it possible for other animals to have other mutations that bring rise to new life, most certainly, it happens all the time. All that is required is a change in envoronment and that the mutation somehow be well equipped to thrive in that new environment and that new species will grow in number. It is very difficult for humans to observe, except through the fossil record, but we can see it in micro organisms that have a new generation every 20 minutes.

Also, recognising that Evolution is how man came to be does not negate God or the Bible. God is still the creator. As to why the Bible says it happend in six days? How else are you going to explain such concepts to a people who have little or no knowledge of science? Even today, people cannot conceive of a period of time like 13,000,000,000 years. However, both the Bible and Big Bang Theory agree that first, there was light.

2006-11-21 23:59:27 · answer #2 · answered by SteveA8 6 · 1 0

SOME EVOLUTIONISTS????!

The great majority, if not all, of evolutionists believe that we (that's you and me) evolved from an ape-like ancestor. If you go back far enough in history, you will find that we had an ancestor in common with the apes, that is, at some stage in the evolutionary tree (pun intended), there was an ape-like animal, whose gene pool split, by way of environmental or natural pressure, into two diverse species, one would eventually become us, the other would become some other form (or forms) of apes. So you could say, equally correctly (or incorrectly) that the apes are descended from us.

This is a simple version, but the basics are there.

2006-11-21 22:16:09 · answer #3 · answered by Labsci 7 · 2 0

Evolutionary theory suggests that man and apes evolved from a common ancestor.

Therefor, in case your question was legit but sloppily asked, present day apes evolved from the ancestor that humans evolved from.

It has been less than 24 hours since I last gave this answer

2006-11-22 01:40:50 · answer #4 · answered by John V 4 · 1 0

When we say that man evolved from apes we are not talking about current species of apes -- we are talking about those species that were around millions of years ago. The most likely candidate at the moment for a common ancestor between man and chimpanzees is Australopithecus afarensis which existed about three or four million years ago.

2006-11-21 22:09:32 · answer #5 · answered by st3f 2 · 1 0

people and contemporary apes have a standard ancestor (additionally probably an ape). it relatively is not that at some point there exchange right into a gorilla that gave delivery to a human and then there have been not greater gorillas. in the sluggish technique of evolution, people descended from branch of an ape family members and contemporary apes from others. there's a common fallacy that evolution is a "ladder" in that some creatures are "greater" and a few are "decrease" or that there is a particular direction that evolution takes. that's all per fake impact of evolution. Differing features of the two contemporary apes and people have shown to prevail so as that diverse species survived. "Intelligence" is a complicated situation partly simply by fact we degree intelligence in different animals by utilising how human their thinking is, which isn't inevitably precise. there is an psychological distinction between different apes and people, yet until we detect a greater valuable thank you to degree intelligence in different animals, discussions on the priority are form of moot. info for? The fossil checklist has been stated of direction. Genetic similarities. there is the certainty that apes are greater alike socially to people than the different animal. Physiological similarities. Behavioral ones. i ask your self why people do not study evolution earlier they attempt to critique it.

2016-10-22 13:11:11 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

We didn't evolve from the current day species of ape, that would be silly. Some species evolve and some don't. There are thousands of species of ape, we were just one of them, once, long ago, and we adapted. It's called nature's selection.

2006-11-21 22:02:00 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Read the text again. The belief isn't that we evolved from apes, but that both us and them have a common ancestor. Due to speciation separate species developed.

2006-11-21 22:50:18 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

They evolved from the first evolutionists. They are busy riding air planes rather than start evolving wings and feathers.

2006-11-21 22:04:31 · answer #9 · answered by St Lusakan 3 · 0 0

It's a hole lot of rubbish! If it was true then the apes we have nowadays are going to evolve into humans too, and you never know, maybe other animals will turn into other things too! I mean, what kind of garbage is that?!

2006-11-21 22:13:33 · answer #10 · answered by Motti _Shish 6 · 0 2

Great apes or abbreviated: Grapes. This would mean their line would have been in a completely different genome. They started out as fruit, hence their tendancy to swing from vines.

2006-11-21 22:03:01 · answer #11 · answered by redcoat7121 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers