my question is for heteresexual and homosexuals i want honest and straight answer from both sides what happens if we only allow homosexuals let's say fo 100 years and say for that period of time no heteresexual. please gve your personal opinion which is balanced and solution to any problems this might have thanks looking for your answers
2006-11-21 18:48:22 · 17 answers · asked by sir aff 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Cultures & Groups ➔ Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender
It wouldn't make any difference anyway, they have been doing it since the beginning of man and now a days are different ways of making babies. Surrogate mothers or invetro.
2006-11-21 18:54:21 · answer #1 · answered by l2wh 4 · 4⤊ 0⤋
This is a psychotic question but I'll give it a go. I hate when people say things like "if everyone was gay then the human race would die out". This is stupid to me because only a small percentage of the population is homosexual and the world population is growing not dwindling. I've read this question several times and I don't quite understand. If you're asking if everyone was homosexual but no heterosexual activity happened then the human species would die out. Unless they used artificial insemination. Otherwise, gay men and women are not stupid and would have sex with each other solely to procreate.
2006-11-21 19:53:01 · answer #2 · answered by DawnDavenport 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
First of all the word is homosexuality and technically homosexuality is already allowed in our country, there is no law against it. If you mean culturally and socially accepting it I think a lot of people already do; your idea of only "allowing it for a 100 years" is ridiculous. Homosexuals find homosexuality the norm, they won't / can't turn themselves straight for a select few.
2006-11-21 19:40:04 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Firstly, I agree with Nlah, your terminology is inaccurate; the term is "homosexuality", not "homosexualism".
Secondly, to impose a restriction on heterosexuals NOT to practice what they consider to be a natural extension of their sexuality and sexual identity would be an inhumane and intolerable act, and you would be guilty of the very same scepter of oppression that homosexuals have been victimized by and tirelessly struggling to be liberated from throughout civilized Modernity. To reverse the struggle, tit for tat, is cruelly unconscionable, and would pervert and skew the Golden Rule into "Do onto others as they have done onto you."
Lastly, and personally, I feel your question feeds the flames of contra distinct opposition, and does not aid in nurturing comprehension of cultural differences and mutual similarities, which otherwise could bridge people together in mutual acceptance of their unique and novel difference.
2006-11-21 22:45:56 · answer #4 · answered by . 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
First you would have to identify all the gay and bi people,and i mean ALL!!!!
...including all the men with the wife and kiddies at home who go and have sex with other men at saunas ext...you will never do it there is more men going home to the wife after a quick bl#w-job than you would ever believe.
If the wife doesn't mind ,why do you?
...gay wasn't invented last week babe it was there 1000s of years before this period of time and will all ways be there like it or not!
Better get used to it because what your doing is like pissing in the wind all you will get is pissed on babe !
2006-11-21 19:19:02 · answer #5 · answered by Bearable 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, It's happening now but people are more discreet about it. You have married men who get involved with other men in discreet relationships and if they didn't feel the need to hide there true selves they would just be with who they truly want to be with another man. Instead you have people who aren't being honest with themselves or love ones and they are living a lie. A man who is heterosexual isn't going to sleep with another man. It's just ain't going to happen because they don't have the desire. If people were more tolerate of GBLT people then the suicide rates for these group of people would go down.
2006-11-21 18:58:23 · answer #6 · answered by What'd You Say? 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
How about explaining your question? "Allow" in what way? No one is claiming homosexuality is to be the only way and stopping heterosexuality. That is what would have to happen for any effect to happen at all. As it stands society would not be impacted any more than it is.
2006-11-21 22:15:20 · answer #7 · answered by IndyT- For Da Ben Dan 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nothing; we already do. There are no restrictions in the US against homosexuality except in a few weird places such as the armed forces.
2006-11-21 19:06:22 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think that is likely to happen, but you never know. Maybe in a 100 years there will be Straight Pride parades in Macon, GA and everyone will be bisexual. LOL
2006-11-21 18:54:49 · answer #9 · answered by ? 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Many governments and societies tried to outlaw and STOP homosxuality, and they never could do that. It has always been around and will always be.
The same is true with heteriosexuality, you can make laws to say it is illegal, but you annot stop it.
(Even if you make a law that saya I am not allwed to be WHITE, I will remain WHITE !! Same with sexuality)
2006-11-21 19:04:47 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋