TNA may not be better then the WWE yet...but soon i think it will be putting up a better fight ... getting Kurt to join TNA was one big step ...Kurt is the best wrestler ever to wrestle in pro wrestling hands down...now just because i say this dues not make me a TNA fan because I'm not i like the WWE more i am also just a Kurt Angle fan...
2006-11-21 21:54:44
·
answer #1
·
answered by djice_04_prez 3
·
3⤊
0⤋
I have been a wrestling fan for about 20 years and right now I would say TNA is a better product from WWE. Right now WWE has too many shows and not enough talent. The talent on Smackdown is just terrible and the Raw talent is overrated. Guys like Cena, Orton, Chris Masters, etc. get young kids excited but the real wrestling fan knows that their mic skills are limited, their matches are brutal and they are just plain overrated. WWE has too many belts which has degraded the belts. WWE has too many PPV's so when a PPV comes they dont have enough time to really build it up. Also over the past 1 1/2- 2 years the WWE has pretty much eliminated the Tag Team division. Yes they do have one but it is gawd awful. I mean they just pass those belts around to whomever has a pulse. TNA has more of a feel of what wrestling should be. WWE has become too "sports entertainment". Guys like Christian,Rhyno, AJ Styles, Abyss, Kurt Angle, Sting, AMV, Raven, etc are really enjoyable to watch. I think in the next couple years you will see many WWE guys start to jump, not so much the big names but more of the mid card guys WWE mis-utilizes.
2006-11-22 02:38:14
·
answer #2
·
answered by Bababooye1 2
·
2⤊
1⤋
WWE is a much more bigger company than TNA.TNA wrestlers are good,I'll admit that,but their mic skills are terrible.Jeff Jarrett can never be a great heel like Triple H.Cena can go to TNA,I don't want him to be in the WWE.WWE is better than TNA because WWE is a variety show.WWE has drama,comedy,tragedy and pro wrestling all roll into one,while TNA just focus on wrestling,so that makes WWE way more entertaining.
Another reason why TNA can't be as big as WWE.If TNA starts to tour the country,most of their wrestlers will quit because they joined TNA so that they won't have to travel alot.So TNA doesn't have much of a choice.
Kurt Angle went to TNA,isn't that much of a big deal but it will give TNA a start.Kurt didn't make WWE,WWE made Kurt Angle and Angle helped WWE back.WWE has many titles,which is good,so that the wrestlers have more chance at being a champion and it'll look good on their resume.Cena sucks,but he does sell merchandise,that's why he always get the title.
2006-11-21 21:04:05
·
answer #3
·
answered by WWE Champ 5
·
2⤊
1⤋
Depending on the matches and wrestlers. I rather not be brand loyal fan, but be a quality wrestling match fan. Now I watch Smackdown because of Chris Benoit, Raw because of HBK and Ric, ECW because of Sabu and CM Punk, and TNA because of Samoa Joe + so many more. I mean I like to watch this few wrestlers because the way they wrestle is cool and exciting. And now with Kurt in TNA, it makes matches there even more exciting. I love to watch TNA more these days because of its less predictable results and combos. Just look at how AJ, Fallen Angel, and Samoa does those combos - really good and exciting. Okay, i stop now, I know there are so many WWE fans here. In the past WWE may have been number 1, but not anymore since they are now currently facing braindrain.
2006-11-22 16:36:14
·
answer #4
·
answered by dranagar 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hey, the exact same thing happened in the Monday Night Wars, remember? WCW vs the old WWF?
WCW was a mega company, backed by Billionaire Ted Turner, while the WWF was a small, private, family-owned company.
Everybody said the WWF would not make it.
Everybody said that Vince should have closed shop early. Everybody said that WCW would run them into the ground with the nWo storyline.
WWF had hacks like Repo man and Doink the clown, while WCW had people like Hulk Hogan and Sting.
Everybody said that WCW had more stars than WWF.
Everybody said that Bischoff was better than McMahon.
Fast forward to today, and what happened? WCW was run down by McMahon. Bischoff worked under McMahon. Why? Two words: Attitude Era.
Yes, most stars jumped from WWF to WCW, but the few that came over from WCW actually became big stars. Men like Stone Cold Steve Austin and Triple H actually came from WCW because they were put into crap storylines.
Unfortunately, WWE is now languishing around post-Attitude Era, and the storylines are really getting stale. Anybody find this as a recap of WCW's nWo storyline? Something got really big, and the company tried to capitalize on it, but it backfired because it got stale. Same thing with Attitude Era, WWE tried to capitalize on its success, and tried to 'bring it back', it backfired because all the storylines have gotten stale.
TNA is on the rise. I'm not saying that the WWE sucks, and I'm certainly not saying TNA sucks, but there still is the possibility that this will turn into another Monday Night War, with 2 new companies: TNA vs WWE. Let's look at the similarities. People are saying that:
TNA is not going to make it.
Jeff Jarrett better close up shop.
WWE would run them into the ground.
WWE has bigger stars than TNA
TNA has people like Christian Cage and Spike Dudley, WWE has people like HHH and Undertaker.
McMahon is better than Jarrett.
TNA has all the "hacks" like the old WWF, while WWE has started drawing TNA's main eventers away. "The Alpha Male" has just signed with the WWE.
Sound familiar?
Well, either that, or McMahon is just waiting for TNA to grow up, to fatten up enough, so that he can buy it over with his millions of dollars, and to induct some fresher stars into his decaying promotion. I mean, some TNA stars have said that they would never work for the WWE, but that could be just talk. Everybody talks. They keep saying they won't go over, until suddenly McMahon makes an offer to them that triples their current salary, then they'll have a change of heart.
However, if anybody were to induct any wrestling company into a hall of fame, it would always be the WWE.
2006-11-22 02:29:40
·
answer #5
·
answered by armageddon_arrives 2
·
2⤊
1⤋
Just because WWE is a bigger company does not mean it is better!
TNA has Lots of talented athletes. Not all of TNA's talent is former WWE Stars. WWE Has Too many Squash Matches.
Besides on WWE All you see every week is the same thing over and over. TNA is actually wrestling. Not bs tv.
2006-11-23 16:42:08
·
answer #6
·
answered by Gamergirl 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
ok we could ignore approximately scores and the packed crowds at each WWE instruct for previous a protracted time. I watch TNA myself and that i like AJ, Morgan, MCMGs (ultimate Tag team seen in a at the same time as), perspective, Wolfe and quite a number of alternative extra. yet Wrestling is activities entertainment. You pronounced it your self getting A S S kicked in a funky way. You look at TNA & WWE. The theatricals the build as much as verify is extra suitable than TNA. TNA has a million announcer on the back and he assume to be the stable cop and the undesirable cop. With WWE you have 2 Announcers helping the countless wrestlers which makes the fits much extra suitable and quite a number of alternative at the back of the curtain there extra adult adult males talking to the wrestlers. everyone that has watch the two WWE, TNA or perhaps WCW be attentive to that WWE is years previous to any opposition. the huge arenas bigger front subject concerns bigger hearth works............only huge!. stepping into on your important element approximately extra suitable Wrestling fits. I agree TNA has some stable fits. it extremely is IMO is to do with PG era. If WWE is going back to TV14, TNA could loose extra scores. it extremely is not suitable in case you have the final wrestlers of the international with and you will positioned the final fits, you should sell it. I propose can we actually watch expert olympic type wrestling with this plenty hobby. of direction no longer because of the fact we like the characters the presentation and the Feuds. TNA needs to invest on convalescing the instruct, not extra over the hill wrestlers.
2016-11-26 00:31:10
·
answer #7
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
TNA has a much better talent base than WWE. I'm a long time wrestling fan and have watched WWE repeat story lines over and over. Not to mention the mis-use of talent, for example this past Monday on Raw Sabu jobbing to Umaga. Sabu is an international star. Who is Umaga? Kurt Angle leaving WWE so he could actually wrestle. And what about the screwing of Brett Hart, Brock Lesnar and even Owen Hart who did not want to do the Blue Blazer angle which lead to his death. Then you have a redneck Asian on Smackdown and cheerleaders on Raw. A lot of WWE guys are seeing TNA as an alternative, not only can they wrestle but they have freedom of character and don't have to do what writers tell them. TNA is the future of wrestling.
2006-11-22 01:17:33
·
answer #8
·
answered by Mephisto 3
·
2⤊
2⤋
I think that wwe has way more talnted superstar than tna, why? It is true that joh cena has been losting a wwe championship title ever since he went to the wrestlemania, but also he came back on top to prove that he can be a champion and still hold the belt for as long as he want to. Yes, raw has only 1 championship belt for a superstar like john cena, but also they got intercontanetal championship and also tag team championship to, so don't think only brand has a belt smackdown! has worldheavyweight championship followed by tag team and cruserweight too, but one other brand has one belt and that is ecw, tna is no where compare to either three of the top brand the world has ever seen.
2006-11-22 00:19:15
·
answer #9
·
answered by yunggary_joke 1
·
0⤊
2⤋
TNA has more talent then WWE like Sting,Scott Steiner,Kevin Nash,the Voodoo Kin Mafia,AJ Styles,Christopher Daniels,Abyss,Jeff Jarrett,Tyson Tomko,Kurt Angle,the Dudley Boys and ,many more.TNA's management is so much better then WWE's because so many WWE superstars are thinking of coming to TNA like,Rey Mysterio,Chris Benoit,Kane and more.Even Jeff Hardy is thinking of coming back to TNA,Vince doesn't treat his superstars properly because he is always in a bad mood.Vince doesn't even have health care for his superstars so it's not hard why so many people prefer TNA.TNA's majority share owner is a billion dollar company so TNA can do what they want but unlike WWE TNA watch what they spend their money on,WWE just throws there money on anything and that's why we haven't seen a good match on WWE for years.The TNA ratings are getting higher and higher and Vince isn't liking it and apart from UFC....TNA is the only show that WWE thinks it's competition is.
So as you can see TNA is better in a lot of ways and the WWE superstars leave WWE on their own terms so as you can see WWE sucks!!!!!!!!!!
TNA all the way!!!!!!!
These could be on their way to TNA.
Hulk Hogan
Scott Hall
Chris Jericho
Kane
Rey Mysterio
Chris Benoit
Brock Lesnar
Goldberg
The Rock(he said he didn't want to be on the road like WWE would make him do but i haven't heard anymore on the situation)
Psicosis of the Mexicools
and more.
2006-11-22 09:11:55
·
answer #10
·
answered by HHH 6
·
1⤊
3⤋