Does anyone still think OJ is innocent?

Answer 1

Hello,

I never thought he was innocent.

In 1992, I was a paralegal student at Mt. San Antonio College in Walnut, CA. After I received my degree, I applied for an internship at the West Covina Dist Atty Office.

One day, one of the D.A.s showed me a black and white book full of murder photos. I looked at it and thought, no big deal. Then, he handed me some color photos to thumb through of a woman with her head almost cut off in a pool of blood. Then, this D.A. asked me who I thought that woman was, I said I did not know. He looked me in the eyes and said that is Nicole Brown Simpson.

I remember that day I was wearing my blue suit and white blouse with a matching headband and black high heels. I still remember to this day I began feeling very dizzy, like the room was spinning and I wanted to faint, and my vision began to blur. I remember grabbing the seat of a nearby desk to sit down where I put my head down in my hands and my heart began to palpatate.

Those were the most disturbing and gross photos of a murder scene I have ever seen and what made it worse was that this case had become so personal to me. Well everyone who witnessed the trial I am sure it became personal them as well.

My feelings and emotions were like that of a friend or loved one. I can't even begin to really comprehend what The Brown's and Goldman's have to deal with every single day of their lives. But, I am sure the images they say were the same ones I saw.

So, yes, I think he is still guilty as sin and his conscience is screaming to tell someone the truth. But, because he is a narcissist, he will always have the upper hand and cause chaos wherever he goes.

Hope this helps you......................................... :-)

Answer 2

Yes, there are still people out there who think he was framed because he is African-American and a hero to his people.
This isn't a slam on anyone of any color. Just my own personal experience with some former co-workers.
I worked with some ladies at the time of the trial who were convinced that this was a frame up done by some type of organized crime figure that OJ owed money to.
They still feel that OJ is innocent.

Answer 3

OJ didn't do it. Stick to the facts of the case. The prosecution never presented all the facts, and they cropped photographs to fit their needs. There was an informant on the case who offers additional facts on the case. Read Stephen Singular's book Legacy of Deception. He also has done good work on JonBenet, and (originally) the Alan Berg murder in Denver. His book offers facts that were never known to the general public. Chris Darden gives him 4 pages in his book (Chapter 11), so he was acknowledged, however, most of his contribution was in working with an informant and giving his information to the defense. His book is critical to understanding the case.

Answer 4

Is it 1995 or is it 2010?

Answer 5

OJ was not innocent but the guilt was not proven beyond reasonable doubt.

Answer 6

Sorry to be lying in wait to answer your question, but heavens NO.

For a short time before I started law school, I entertained the idea that his son might have done it and that OJ was covering up.

When I read the trial transcripts, and saw the evidence, I discarded any alternative perp theory.

Answer 7

The answer lies with OJ's son from his earlier relationship. OJ himself was miles away from the event. It doesn't help when we have corrupt, racist policemen dealing with such a dreadful event. Trust does become a massive issue.

Answer 8

Other than OJ? No --- and he is STILL searching for the REAL KILLERS on golf courses all over America.

Answer 9

The answer is..why should anyone realy care now?
He is Innocent by the rules of judgment/law and Guilty by the rules/eyes of the public...

Answer 10

Did you hear about Bush's new book "If I Lied"?
OJ killed three people. Bush killed over half a million.