English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

give me the exact person or...organization.

2006-11-21 16:58:45 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous in Science & Mathematics Biology

3 answers

I can't give you every single person who supports/opposes it. Here are some names (all contemporary, and only those I could think of off the top of my head), though [note: I define "opposers" as those who have specifically spoken out against creationism; I also define creationism as the literal intervention of god, that is to say, nothing could happen without a god there to make it happen, which is different than theistic evolution):

Supporters:
Kent Hovind
Ken Ham
Hugh Ross
Ray Comfort
William Dembski
Michael Behe

Opposers:
Richard Dawkins
Carl Sagan
PZ Myers
Ed Brayton
Massimo Pigliucci
Carl Zimmer
Judge John Jones
Ken Miller
Stephen Jay Gould
Jack Horner

Please note that the number of people accepting of a position does not necessarily mean that position is correct. Also note that each of those mentioned in the opposition list are actual biologists, whereas those mentioned in the supporters list are preachers. Majority may not count, but schooling does.

2006-11-21 19:53:05 · answer #1 · answered by abulafia24 3 · 1 0

Mosus and God supports it creationism. And they are old dude.
The bible has some stuff in it that more or less proves that God created it all. The writing in the bible go back to creation and there are scriptures that are spoke by these dudes called prophet in which we are given such information that one could only conclude they had recieve the information from a higher more knowedgeable being then them. In The book of Job it speak of the channels in the sea and the vallies of the oceans. That was back when no one had been to the bottom of the oceans and we did not know of the sea has channels under the waves. In the bible it also gives us healing medicians that have not been proved by science in our age. It even refers to the kneting of the seman in the womb that was like 5500 years before we had a telescope or a microscope. If you know much about math you will have to agree that the odds of life as we know it evolving are outragious. Also there is new informaiton coming from the feilds of mechanics that indicate everthing is designed. Take for example the Human Eyeball that is a design that could come only by design. The bible tells us that the stars sing and science proved it 5000 years latter. The bible tells us so much more. It is the first place a person should start researching.
We in science use logic to derive the truth. We get nothing from nothing. But the big bang is about getting order from disorder and getting something from nothing. That is not logical.
Evoluation is about live that is changing into something that has yeat to take place on this planet. We see freak mutation but not beneficial Mutation. Thus evoluation is flawed because it just does not stand the test of time. That is why there is fraud involved in the evoluation cases from day one. You know fraud is fraud period. Scopes is a example of the fraud in evoluation. The know fossel record does not support evoluation. The know record of the earths crust does not support evoluation. And the know magnet decay rate of the earth does not support evoluation.
So if 98 percent of the science field tell you that evoluaton is a fraud and 2 percent say it is the truth who do you think is right.
The 98 percent.

2006-11-22 03:39:51 · answer #2 · answered by adsdetailing 2 · 0 2

The Discovery Institute supports Creationism under the guise of Intelligent Design, and opposes teaching of evolution. See http://www.discovery.org/

The National Academy of Sciences, advisors to the nation on science, engineering, and medicine, opposes the teaching of Creationism as science. See http://www.nas.edu/

2006-11-22 01:43:25 · answer #3 · answered by Scythian1950 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers