English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Is this just a coincidence or the truth about what Bush's real motives?

2006-11-21 15:55:41 · 26 answers · asked by A fan 4 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

26 answers

I disagree with knowsigns... that was one mistake clinton made, but what about the mistakes Buh has made? I'm a New Yorker and was deeply affected by the 9/11 tragedy. What did Bush do about that tragedy? Invade the privacy of millions of Americans right? What should he have done? If you read Time magazine you would've read a punchline about how some director is making a movie about the search for osama bin laden, it's 300 hours long with no ending. That is precisely the kind of search President Bush led. I am oly 12 and you cannot guess how strong the deep contempt for the failed capture of Osama Bin Laden is. During that search he went off into Iraq, called it operation Iraqi Liberation, or: O.I.L. What did he want? the destroyer of America in jail, or oil? He didn't even need oil then. I know what people will say that he didn't do it for oil, but how sure can you be? My theory about why he changed Operation Iraqi Liberation's name was because OPEC told him you can't have our oil. He didn't want to look stupid that's why he changed the name! In my point of view Bush is the worst president we possibly could have at times like this when theres a war being waged in Iraq!! I'm only 12 years old and i feel this way, call me an anger bomb just waiting to explode, but i would say some very "colorful" things about our dear president if i didn't have faith in the Americans that trusted him.

2006-11-21 16:09:04 · answer #1 · answered by Blarhbhb 2 · 3 5

Under Clinton the WTC was bombed, as was the USS Cole and a few embassies. He did nothing about it, just let them continue killing people. This lead to 9/11, which fell into Bush's hands. He had to do something about it, and he did. Clinton's "peace" was just ignore the deaths of people and hope it goes away. Look at the 3000 people that died because of it. Bush's real motives? Avenging those who died.

2006-11-21 18:17:33 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 4 0

I think you are trying to see something that isn't there. What I mean is Clinton was so good at what he did; we never knew what was really going on out there. He had everything under wraps and dealt with it swiftly. As for Bush, he is just the opposite (not a big fan, but I will say this) he blindly and loudly voices aggression like it is the only thing going. To the louder folks, the louder action and hatred that comes with it. Clinton was a brilliant man, however, sneaky...not sure which is better sometimes?

2006-11-21 16:12:58 · answer #3 · answered by daff73 5 · 3 2

Yep under Clinton the North Koreans got the ability to make nukes. Also they North Koreans were given many extras when it comes to making regular weapons which they sold to many other countries, uncluding Iran. Under Clinton the terrorists were given money by him and his staff to say how sorry the U.S. was that we were attacked by them. They loved the U.S. durring this time alright.

2006-11-21 17:10:56 · answer #4 · answered by fatboysdaddy 7 · 7 0

the price of peace is always the blood of war.btw if you turn clinton around you will find bush

2006-11-21 16:05:33 · answer #5 · answered by ironman 4 · 5 0

Bush's real motive was to build up the military. He wanted to be a "war president'. Clinton wanted very much to be a "peace president". In both cases, their success was limited by members of congress that were mostly interested in remaining members of congress.

2006-11-21 23:51:21 · answer #6 · answered by Paul K 6 · 0 4

Almost.............. Almost....................Almost
World trade center bombing.
USS Cole attack
Janet Reno killing nearly one hundred citizens.
Oklahoma City Bombing
Not to mention the other suicide bombings around the world that took place under Clintons watch.

I call that peace.

I think your amount of hatred has increased ten fold.

2006-11-21 16:11:26 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 7 1

Man what world are you living in.

a) Sadam was still loose in his lavish underground rape rooms.

b) His sons KOO-KOO and TOO-KI were alive and reeking havoc.

c) Osama bombed the WTC for the first time.

d) Bosnia fighting in that area was going on.

yea sure - when you finally graduate high school your eyes will see beyond the blinders that your milky white liberal school teachers are brainwashing you with..--

2006-11-21 16:48:50 · answer #8 · answered by caciansf 4 · 6 0

Sweet lord. Been listening to your college professor a bit too much, eh?

Got off the pot and do some research before you make stupid statements.

And no, I am not a huge fan of Bush either, so do not chalk this reply up to a neo-con defending their president.

2006-11-21 16:03:52 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 9 2

It's just the selective way you have chosen to look at it. When you grow up you will realize the reality of it.

2006-11-21 18:37:58 · answer #10 · answered by kitty fresh & hissin' crew 6 · 4 0

fedest.com, questions and answers