i agree with you ..he seemed to have a sence of humor that way while still being able to cause damage in the ring
2006-11-21 15:16:22
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
The Masked Kane was better
2006-11-22 17:57:28
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
The version of Kane back in 2000/2001 when he was with Undertaker as the Brothers Of Destruction.
2006-11-22 18:13:52
·
answer #3
·
answered by HHH 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
The fully masked Kane.That version was awesome.
2006-11-22 05:17:02
·
answer #4
·
answered by WWE Champ 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
I like the full mask
2006-11-21 23:16:41
·
answer #5
·
answered by Amy B 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
mask kane! he seems to be much stronger and fights better with a mask.
2006-11-22 06:32:52
·
answer #6
·
answered by nicky 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
i like the new version...no more hiding behind a mask
2006-11-21 23:17:34
·
answer #7
·
answered by Gamer4Life 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
I agree with ya. I wonder if the mask protected from punches?
2006-11-22 00:20:20
·
answer #8
·
answered by phliuy 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
the masked kane cause he was more selfish, aggresive and evil
2006-11-22 21:39:25
·
answer #9
·
answered by jamaican babe 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
no mask is dumb! the full face mask was cool
2006-11-21 23:27:19
·
answer #10
·
answered by $ucram 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
with the mask
2006-11-22 19:52:27
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋