Why do liberals think there were no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq?

Question

http://therealamericantruth.com/iraq.html

Answer 1

Because they dont want to face the truth!......... If I was a terrorist freak, and I heard that the US was coming, I wouldnt leave them there, I would move them to a Country that is off limits to Americans, which is what happened.....duhh, honestly, the ignorance of some people is soo amazing to me....

Answer 2

Because there were no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.

Answer 3

WRONG
Your President has already admitted that Iraq had no WMD
The Iraq Survey Group, apart from a few stockpiles, did not find the large quantities of weapons that the regime was believed to possess.

On December 14, 2005, while discussing the WMD issue, Bush stated that "It is true that much of the intelligence turned out to be wrong."

Your President has also lost the war on terror.

National Intelligence Estimate (a consensus report of the heads of 16 U.S. intelligence agencies) asserted that the Iraq war had increased Islamic radicalism and worsened the terror threat.

Then he cherry picked WMD evidence to manipulate Congress and America for support of the Iraq War.


http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/10/14/60II/main577975.shtml
http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/articles/031027fa_fact?031027fa_fact
http://thinkprogress.org/2006/11/19/hersh-iran-agent/

Answer 4

Because those aren't the WMD's we were looking for and we shouldn't have been looking for them because Saddam told us in the mid 90's that they had already been destroyed. The libs will say they aren't post gulf war blah blah blah.

Answer 5

Officials in the Bush Administration come together to prepare for Secretary of State Powell's February 5 speech to the UN, in which Powell will put all credible US evidence on the table and make the case for war to the international community. Powell reads an early draft based on work down by Cheney aide I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby and, finding the material poorly sourced and misleading, throws several pages in the air and exclaims, "I'm not reading this. This is bullshit."
The preparations will go on for four days and three nights. Intense scrutiny will be applied to assertions made routinely by Cheney and others, in hopes that Powell will commit himself to only the very best of American intelligence. One 38-page list of allegations against Iraq is whittled down to six pages by Powell and his team.
Hans Blix, the chief U.N. weapons inspector, appears before the Security Council and says that searches have found "no evidence" of mobile biological production facilities in Iraq. He also says that the Iraqis are cooperating with the inspectors. The IAEA's ElBaradei also speaks and says, "After three months of intrusive inspections, we have to date found no evidence or plausible indication of the revival of a nuclear weapon program in Iraq." He says the Niger uranium documents are "not authentic."

Answer 6

Bush said we were going in there for WMD made post gulf-war...

Bush said himself that none of the ones we were going in there for have been found...

everyone knows he had WMD in the 80s...

Answer 7

Because there were none,nada,zip, zilch, It was a ruse to sell a phony war that America cannot escape. Soldiers die everyday from improvised bombs made in basements.

Answer 8

I think more then Liberals are thinking that.. I guess the main question should be were there any WMD found.. From a credible source..

Answer 9

Even Bush admitted there were none found. Can you produce any credible evidence?

Answer 10

Please stop giving links to false, phoney, and specious websites that spew false information. The search team looking for WMD's were appointed, and selected by Bush. The team members, themselves said there were none.