Arent the frames of references the real dimensions?
2006-11-21 11:31:57 · 7 answers · asked by goring 6 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Physics
Would a volume be defined as a containment quantity?
2006-11-21 11:45:33 · update #1
Volume is NOT a dimension. It is a property of an object. Dimensions are descriptions of the space we live in. We can describe any point in our space-time with four dimensions. Using regular cartesian coordinates, those dimensions are usually called t, x, y, and z. You can also use radial coordinates, t, r, theta and phi.
2006-11-21 13:50:40 · answer #1 · answered by crackerman 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
height, width, and length are the classic three . . volume is a combination of all three
time is usually considered the 4th dimension .. .
2006-11-21 19:34:58 · answer #2 · answered by a_blue_grey_mist 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes
2006-11-21 19:37:41 · answer #3 · answered by david e 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes
2006-11-21 19:34:01 · answer #4 · answered by duck boy 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yeah, because volume is the same as depth (you already know that now, right??)
2006-11-21 19:33:51 · answer #5 · answered by Ms. Me 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes it is
2006-11-21 19:35:17 · answer #6 · answered by dudedrt 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
of course.
2006-11-21 19:33:48 · answer #7 · answered by dirtydistrict85 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋