Why is Limbaugh lying AGAIN?? I never knew he stopped!
This piece of dog doodoo is nothing more than a Nazi-inspired propagandist for the Republican party.
It's only a matter of time before he convinces his 'ditto heads' that it's 'acceptable' to criticize, abuse, torture or even kill any individual who doesn't subscribe to the 'pure' conservative agenda. Anyone Limbaugh hates will be subjected to his own version of the 'final solution', including: homosexuals; liberals; street-corner drug addicts; welfare recipients; non-Christians; non-whites; the poor, the elderly, the sick, the homeless, and the hungry; and anyone else Limbaugh hates (he spreads hatred and bigotry like maggots spread disease).
Of course, anyone Limbaugh "likes" will be part of the 'pure' conservative movement, including: pedophiles; prescription-drug abusers; corporate welfare recipients; millionaires; white collar criminals; lawyers; and white Christians.
Limbaugh can't stop lying, even when his toxic-waste mouth isn't moving. He's a cretin! -RKO-
2006-11-21 08:57:56
·
answer #1
·
answered by -RKO- 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
He was using that analogy as a figure of speech. Terrorists want Democrats to win our election because they are the most prone to withdraw troops from Iraq. That way the terrorists can get back to the business they want - planning more attacks on US soil. Why face them in Iraq when we can have more attacks like 9/11? Do you see what the problem in that line of thinking is?? Now we'll see what happens with the new congress.
2006-11-21 08:57:21
·
answer #2
·
answered by bardstale 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
He was wrong.
Absolutely and typically wrong.
Terrorist want nationalists to fight,not Democrats
Q:Why are we in Iraq?
A:Did I read you implying that the Democrats were the terrorists choice in the past elections? If so,you need to learn something about terrorists.Terrorists dont want to fight modernized diplomats.Since when does Iraq attack Europe,for example.
Terrorists are nationalists,and they want to fight nationalists.Why? Because nationalists would rather die than change a policy to give terrorists less of a reason to attack them.Cheney's "full speed ahead" is tailor made for a member of Al Qadea to say "See? If I dont attack them,they'll kill me".And so it goes.
If the United States had not spent decades trying to bully the Midle East into submission,it might have caught on to the modern approach some younger,more secularized Muslims want. We went to Iraq under the false premise that Bush supposed that Iraq has WMDs,of which he later admitted wasnt true,now we are "stuck" as John Kerry put it,until the Middle East decides for itself that it can sustain itself.
This is a bad situation with no easy way out for anyone
2006-11-21 08:45:36
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
3⤋
Republican values have little to do with intercourse. Republican values take care of (or could) financial accountability and problematical punishment for crime and powerful protection of the country. recently the clowns in workplace have failed in any respect 3 that's why they lost the majority. Rush, from what I certainly have heard has left the Republican occasion through their loss of values. Sexual concerns are actually not political concerns until they interfere with accountability or ensue in public workplace. intercourse is a cultural element with values desperate by utilising the inhabitants as an entire. some attempt to make it political through a faux impression of the Bible.
2016-11-25 23:19:35
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
ok, 1st of all, you do know ther's no such thing as a Baugh, so rush can't have a limp one. 2nd of all, in your avatar, are you making the universal "I'm crazy" sign, or are you shooting yourself in the head? please, let it be the latter. and, guess what, if terrorists could vote, they'd vote for the only party stupid and naiive enough to have sympathy for them. Rush could win a "smart' contest with you with half his brain tied behind his back "just to make it fair". if you ever actually listened to Rush, you'd know the signifigance of that statement.
2006-11-21 08:49:36
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
Looks like someone's obsessed with Rush!
2006-11-21 08:44:44
·
answer #6
·
answered by sacolunga 5
·
6⤊
1⤋
Why didn't you read the answer I just gave to this question a few minutes ago? What the heck?
2006-11-21 08:53:52
·
answer #7
·
answered by dakota29575 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
you don't have to go all the way back to Oct. 19 to find Rush lying. you could get that from today's show.
2006-11-21 08:53:30
·
answer #8
·
answered by truth seeker 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
When is Rush not lying. He talks for hours and never really says a damn thing. He's a spineless, gay, drug addict, and one of the most pathetic excuses for a human being I've ever seen.
2006-11-21 08:50:02
·
answer #9
·
answered by flip4449 5
·
2⤊
3⤋
He might be back on the oxy-contin, he said LIBERALS give him a huge pain in his rear.
2006-11-21 09:03:54
·
answer #10
·
answered by daydoom 5
·
0⤊
0⤋