Iam for the browns and goldmans and the kids.. but to be honest I prolly would have watched it..
2006-11-21 05:51:42 · 7 answers · asked by vicki f 2 in News & Events ➔ Media & Journalism
I personally feel he did do it, I feel he is very arrogant and thinks now that he didn't do jail time, "he has the public right where he wants it." So he goes and write a book, I'm going to assume he feels, even people that felt he was guilty would buy the book, hey they may also want to know "how he WOULD" have done it, but more so, the people that don't think he did it. It's all a scheme it makes me sick to my stomach that someone can stoop soooo slow, it's just inhuman. How can someone, after all these years reopen a big wound like that, I really feel for the victims children and the families
2006-11-21 06:15:24 · answer #1 · answered by heaven_forsaken_dark_poet 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The responses to this occasion is thrilling and distinctive. There are sturdy, stereotypical and distinctive replies and comments approximately this occasion; and with regards to despite if the e book could desire to have been printed. truthfully it particularly is not suitable to debate or positioned up how a guy or woman could have killed everyone. that's an emotional difficulty and thoughts do in comparison to info. Factually provided, i'm undecided if the info have been delivered so coherently. besides the undeniable fact that, i think that someway Simpson performed a place in the crimes. White usa has a confusing time with the outcomes; and so does an incredible majority of black usa. White usa is discover to getting "justice" even whilst the info are actually not clean a pair of black on white crime. Black usa does in comparison to what has transpired; and continually they remember lynchings, murders and different hardcore crimes commited against them that have been unpunished or marginally. We could desire to maintain in mine a fact approximately human beings...we view the worldwide and characteristic critiques that are in step with our studies. it particularly is confusing questioning that any guy can committ a criminal offense and stroll loose or obtain a marginal punishment. besides the undeniable fact that, it has occurred repeated for the time of heritage.
2016-12-29 07:26:21 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
YES! Why would he want to put salt on the wounds of the Goldman and the Brown families???
He doesn't care!
2006-11-21 06:00:32 · answer #3 · answered by kymmy_kins 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think Rupert Murdock was wise to pull the book. This book served no purpose except to rub victims families through the mud again. OJ needs to live a quiet life out of the news. He can't seem to do it and seems to be willing to tease and temp us with "I got away with murder" attitude. He must be a tormented soul.
2006-11-21 05:58:26 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
OJ is a bastard and a murderer and I m glad it was pulled why should he amke any more money for the horrific deed he proclaims he didnt do.
2006-11-21 06:01:03 · answer #5 · answered by Headie Who 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yep, let him find another way to make money instead of on the people that he killed.
Why doesn't he try and get a job like everyone else?
Then again who would hire him?
2006-11-21 06:08:02 · answer #6 · answered by Ha Ha Charade You Are................... 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yes and I wouldn't have watched it.
2006-11-21 10:43:01 · answer #7 · answered by rhymingron 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋