2006-11-21 04:44:07 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Royalty
Problem is there are soooooo many apt rude names for that awful man!
But I hope it catches on!
2006-11-21 23:30:42 · answer #1 · answered by Sarah A 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Whatever happened with him being named Tony the Lapdog
2006-11-21 13:54:46 · answer #2 · answered by eilishaa 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
We didn`t want no stupid war
Parents lost their kids you know
I think Tony Blair`s a lucky man
His kids weren`t old enough to go!
2006-11-21 15:28:32 · answer #3 · answered by ann f 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It's not bad. I like Tony Bliar for its simplicity.
2006-11-21 12:50:34 · answer #4 · answered by Katya-Zelen 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes it's a good name for him, but what about Gordon the Glum?
2006-11-21 12:48:11 · answer #5 · answered by Phlodgeybodge 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
We all voted for the party TWICE.
More a case of sour grapes I think.
2006-11-22 07:23:08 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes and so is B -liar and smirking arrogant **** and a whole stack of other names .all i can`t come up with is a nice name for him
2006-11-21 17:55:55 · answer #7 · answered by keny 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
clarence the cross eyed lion would be better
he certainly dont see what the english public does
2006-11-21 22:12:19 · answer #8 · answered by Markus E 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That is about right right, Liar is well named
2006-11-21 14:05:38 · answer #9 · answered by Stephen P 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well how about "Tony the ****"
2006-11-21 12:47:30 · answer #10 · answered by Eyedoc 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋