English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

There is a lot of talk that Hilary is the likely Democratic candidate in '08. Most Presidents have had prior administrative experience, such as being a governor of a state. I am not aware of any such experience in her past. As far as public service, she only brings 1 term as a US Senator. (I believe JFK was the last President who was a Senator prior to becoming President, and was not a Governor). Any serious input, I am curious?

2006-11-21 04:12:04 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

13 answers

One would assume it is the fact she was a Senator twice. I seem to recall she worked on the impeachment hearings of President Nixon. In any case she has a decent background in serving in/near the US government.
BTW I am against Hilary being President but I must confess her background is not bad and I'd say somewhat better than slick Willie her husband.

2006-11-21 04:19:53 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

While she has experience in politics, I personally would have a real hard time casting my vote for her. Her past performance in the senate has been one of opportunistic flip-flopping and pandering. I think she lacks integrity (what pol doesn't?) and her interests lie very far out of the realm of what is important to me, I just could not vote for her. A difference of opinion in what the future direction of this country ought to be. Biggest problem I have with her. No personal attack on her, just my gut feeling. She is highly intelligent, but that plays little importance in what one's socio-political beliefs are. She meets all the legal requirements to run for the office, just not a viable candidate for my vote.

2006-11-21 12:29:03 · answer #2 · answered by Rich B 5 · 1 0

She lived in the White House for 8 years. She was exposed to a great deal of Presidential Politics while there for those years. She has been a U.S. senator for 6 years. She actually has more political experience than George Bush did at the time he was elected.

It is not my call to say that she will make a good or bad President, I just think she has more experience in a way than GWB did.

2006-11-21 12:24:51 · answer #3 · answered by truth seeker 7 · 0 2

Kind of like Cheney our VP., mmmm what about George Sr or Ford or Nixon to name a few recent ones were never governers, and most were not Senators

2006-11-21 12:36:53 · answer #4 · answered by Jon J 4 · 0 0

She's just as qualified as Bill was.
He was just a big irresponsible kid that had fun & games for 8 years.
He had never held a real job a day in his life. He lived off the taxpayers from the time he was a kid.
Hillary made $10,000 an hour working for the Rose Law Firm. (She never even had to go to the office.)

2006-11-21 12:21:43 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

She's fooled the idiots of New York into voting for her! Otherwise, I see nothing to qualify her for being anything more than a bordello madame.

2006-11-21 12:23:57 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

She is not fit for the office. She is too selfish and blind. I think the bar has been set pretty high with Pres. Bush as the current President.

2006-11-21 12:21:20 · answer #7 · answered by mjcariati1971 3 · 2 1

Well she was exposed to the fact that Bill thought there were WMD's in Iraq! She did vote to go to war in Iraq, and thinks we should be there. I hope she does run.............can't wait to see the political adds then. Yeeeeehaaaaaaaaaaawwwwwwwww!

2006-11-21 12:30:09 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

She is an American citizen, born here and over 35 years of age. those are the requirements.

2006-11-21 12:18:53 · answer #9 · answered by Schmorgen 6 · 1 1

You got some nerve to demand qualifications after you people gave us Dan Quayle and George Bush

2006-11-21 12:18:08 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 3

fedest.com, questions and answers