Rupert Murdock came out and said that it was an ill-conceived idea. Don't you think that was obvious before it was all planned, and should never have even been considered in the first place?
2006-11-21 02:32:17 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Media & Journalism
Of course. When I even heard the title of the interview and the new book I was shocked. One guy in the news had a good point he said that this was crazy because it will be opening old wounds for the victims families. Now they are cancelling it because its was an "ill-conceived idea", they should have been smart enough and rational from the beginning.
2006-11-21 02:37:34 · answer #1 · answered by Babygirl 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Of course. You are absolutely correct. Just because it was ill conceived and totally lacking in class doesn't necessarily mean Murdock would kill the idea though. After all he let the Fox nes channel idea go through didn't he?
2006-11-21 02:35:45 · answer #2 · answered by toff 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't believe they ever expected the public outrage! It was all about money from the book with no concern for the families of the victims and the children. Fortunately, the media and public outcry enlighted the publisher and changed their mind.
2006-11-21 02:43:55 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The idea should have never gone as far as it did. Because of money, the idea took off and was made into writing because they were counting their profits beforehand. Not too smart on any of the people involved.
2006-11-21 03:41:21 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
specific, yet additionally think approximately that in case you soak a pair of leather-based gloves in blood then enable them to dry they're going to decrease. additionally in case you're rich you may have the money for a pair of gloves that for the duration of good shape completely, and because your wrist is smaller than your hand you ought to cup your hand to get the glove on in case you notice in the court docket docket video OJ has his hand opened flat on a similar time as attempting to positioned on the glove.
2016-10-22 11:49:19 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Rupert misjudged the whole thing, blinded by the money portion
2006-11-21 02:34:11 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Greed was the catalyst for all this; when there was such a public outcry, Murdoch had to realize that he wasn't going to make as much money as he thought he would, so he junked the project. -RKO-
2006-11-21 05:05:11 · answer #7 · answered by -RKO- 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I always thought he was guilty, now I am sure he is. I only saw a little bit about this on TV, but it made me sick!! It definately should have never been considered.
2006-11-21 02:42:11 · answer #8 · answered by cherrygurl 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They didn`t realize that Blacks were still hated that much in this country. Plus, if you can make MONEY off of minorities, it`s always OK in this country, but to give them a chance to be equal , and say their mind...NO WAY JOSE..
2006-11-21 03:06:18 · answer #9 · answered by faisy26 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
all of you are getting the wrong view on this just except the fact that fox will put anything on TV. for the record he did do it its obvious exept it and move on
2006-11-21 02:42:19 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋