I think it was a great move to cancel the book. The man was in hot water too long and that book could have definately resurfaced alot of contreversy. I think it was a dumb idea anyway. What do you think???
2006-11-21 01:56:23 · 13 answers · asked by Unshaken Faith 4 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Celebrities
I am so glad they axed it, what was OJ thinking? It has been years since that occured, let the victims families have peace.
2006-11-21 01:59:39 · answer #1 · answered by inquisitor1125 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes I do think it was a great idea to cancel OJ's book. My main reason for feeling this way, is because it's hurtful to Nicole's family, especially her children. OJ didn't get on the stand and defend himself during the trial, so why do it now? The case is now 12 years old, it's time for him to move on and make money other ways, than off his deceased ex wife. I personally think OJ did it and for the love of God, how can he look his children in the face, knowing he's the reason that they are motherless. He may be free, but when judgment day comes, all the ice in the world, won't be able to soothe the pain he'll feel, when those flames are on his @ss!
2006-11-21 02:40:46 · answer #2 · answered by A_WWE_FAN_4LYFE 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
OJ became into thoroughly investigated, tried in court and had the information evaluated by a jury who got here across him "no longer to blame" of this crime. He has constantly maintained his innocence of this deed and he wrote a theoretical e book (which does no longer contain a confession). money no longer narcissism became into probable the incentive in writing the e book as there's a civil healthful debt and a could furnish an inheritance for his toddlers etc. The trial criminal expert's Cochran, Marcia and Darden wrote their very own books and won hundreds of thousands. some issues that the jury might have seen: -The investigator who got here across the glove later dedicated PERJURY concerning his severe racist comments. - yet another investigator took a vial pattern of OJ's blood from the lab and carried it INTO the crime scene. - The glove did no longer greater healthful OJ's hand (incorrect length). - There on no account became into the quantity of blood on OJ's physique, outfits, domicile or vehicle consistent with somebody who had dedicated that crime in individual.. - The homicide weapon became into on no account related to him or got here across. - The jury became into taken to circulate to OJ's domicile and did no longer see a large blood path. - there have been no witnesses to the definitely crime. - in all probability the jury got here across him harmless because of the fact there became right into a loss of actual information to convict. some might disagree with the call besides the undeniable fact that it is unfair for them to blatantly say with a incontrovertible fact that this guy is to blame. at situations a writer controls the final content fabric or maybe the call of a e book which an author could comply with if he needs the settlement
2016-12-10 12:59:06 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think that OJ is looking for attention...the spotlight hasnt been on him i think he should just go back wherever he was unheard from the world forever!!! I get tired of hearin OJ makes me want some orange juice!!!!
2006-11-21 02:04:19 · answer #4 · answered by LUCKYGIRL 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I agree. If OJ had anything to say, it should have been said during his trial. "If I Had Done It", written supposedly, so that his kids could have a college education. What an after thought!!
2006-11-21 02:02:56 · answer #5 · answered by kayboff 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hell ya I think he should . I think anything that OJ does should be cancelled He is trying to make money off of the murder of his wife,HOW WRONG IS THAT!!!!!!!!! He is just a dumb SOB that can't play sports anymore.
2006-11-21 02:01:15 · answer #6 · answered by ldbevers21 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I just hope this isn't a ploy you know how people are-they say I can't read something or watch something then they really want to read or watch it. He will burn in hell someday. I don't even like hearing anything about him.
2006-11-21 02:33:15 · answer #7 · answered by butterflyaht1 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think his guilt was bothering him and this was his way of saying he did it he wrote it as a fiction but I think it was truth I also think he thought people were stupid and wouldn't know that in reality he was saying THIS IS HOW I DID IT
2006-11-21 02:19:04 · answer #8 · answered by MARY ann 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think it was a great idea,I don't want to see,read or hear anything about that idiot.
2006-11-21 02:03:44 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think OJ should be tried with conspiracy I.E. conspiracy to murder he had a driver remember.
2006-11-21 02:04:27 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋