the western countries security threat will be decreased... and muslims will stop creating such a hatred scene
plus, israel and its neighbors will live in peace
2006-11-20
23:26:15
·
11 answers
·
asked by
Ouzian
1
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
either u give up hope tooo easily or u just dont care of those whose lives is passing day by day...
2006-11-20
23:37:28 ·
update #1
yellow, I suggest you look at my other questions, besides, you must confront what is behind hamas and muslim opposition in israel and around the world, it is the MISCONCEPTION about israel's creation...
if you can TAKE AWAY that misconception by just reciting historical facts .... then they would definitely agree.. PERIOD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
2006-11-20
23:44:09 ·
update #2
I thought so, you must CONFRONT those muslims with LOGIC and recitation of historical facts to CLEAR OUT MISCONCEPTIONS
why is that soo hard to understand??
2006-11-20
23:46:40 ·
update #3
007, ur narrowmindedness and insensitivity disgusts me... there is NO SUCH THING as radical islam!!!!!!! islam is islam..... what made those guyz radical is MISCONCEPTION!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
2006-11-20
23:51:34 ·
update #4
seneca, if its ur internal problem, then u have everything to gain by clearing out this misconception!!! cant u see?? radical islam as I stated does not exist, look my answer to 007....
and thats NOT true, radical muslims dont only listen to fellow muslims.... ANY humans can talk to them and REASON OUT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
2006-11-20
23:54:03 ·
update #5
producer, please dont generalize, Im sure diversity exists everywhere... have an open mind....if this misconception gets cleared out, you save MANY human lives
2006-11-21
00:17:20 ·
update #6
Why must the West provide an external solution to what is an internal problem?
Radicalized Muslims can only dissuaded by fellow Muslims.
The West has had enough, and a peaceable context may very well be impossible if they are attacked again-- force is what Islamic extremists will find from the Western countries.
The person below me is correct.
It's not that your suggestion is a bad one.
Extremists have ventured beyond the bounds of reasoning-- it's what makes them dangerous.
I don't wish conflict with anyone, but if it's demanded of me, then I have no choice.
2006-11-20 23:51:24
·
answer #1
·
answered by ? 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
I don't think that will solve anything, the Europeans and the US are clear in their positions on Israel's right to exist as a peaceful nation in the middle east, however its neighbors with the exception of Egypt and perhaps Jordan do not want them their and are still carrying bruised egos from wars in '48 through '73. Islam ideology talks about how Shi'ite and Sunni would rather live next to a Jew or a christian than one another but that is not how it is practiced. Secondly, Jerusalem is the third most holy city in Islam as it is Judaism and Christianity's most holy city. This is a conflict that may never be solved, save for total destruction or cooperation between 3 religions both scenarios seem implausible. Its a long conversation, I have it weekly and I practice none of the religions involved, I am truly agnostic, though I have studied all three ideologies and find good and bad in all three as well as good and bad people practicing them.
2006-11-21 07:39:59
·
answer #2
·
answered by yellowkayak 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Israel has the right to exist, nearly everyone on earth agree's to that including moderate Arabs.
Only a slim radical minority thinks Israel should be destroyed because they hate freedom & democracy.
If Muslims act up because they can't have their way THEY should be punished for their behavior. These radical Muslims who murder, rae and cause chaos will be held responsible for their crimes against humanity
2006-11-21 07:45:10
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
It is obscene to consider that Israel might have to defend its right to exists. Do the 22 Arab states have to justify their existence?
Jordan, Pakistan and Iraq, for example, were never "states"--they all found the cartographers pen by being "created and legitimized by external powers."
Israel, on the other hand, existed for centuries.
Israel is the only Jewish state in the whole world. The Arabs have 22 states. The Arabs are not wiling to accept a Jewish state in their midst.
Israel thought that by leaving Gaza entirely in August 2005, that the Arabs would get their act together and develop their economy. Instead, the Arab have seen fit to launch thousands of missiles at Israel's civilian population, intending to kill as many citizens as possible.
Israel, on the other hand, is trying to live in peace. When they do attack, it is with the clear objective of silencing the Arab terrorists. By international law, Israel is totally justified in its quest to protect its citizens. The Arabs are in total violation of international law by unprovoked attacking of innocent civilians in Israel.
The Palestinian Arabs could have had a state already, if they only behaved like civilized human beings. But they have proven time and again that they are not ready to behave, and so the Arabs will have to exist with "only" 22 states.
Before the creation of the State of Israel, who were the Palestinians?
Until 1950, the name of the Jerusalem Post was THE PALESTINE POST; the journal of the Zionist Organization of America was NEW PALESTINE; Bank Leumi was the ANGLO-PALESTINE BANK; the Israel Electric Company was the PALESTINE ELECTRIC COMPANY; there was the PALESTINE FOUNDATION FUND and the PALESTINE PHILHARMONIC. All these were Jewish organizations. In America, Zionist youngsters sang "PALESTINE, MY PALESTINE", "PALESTINE SCOUT SONG" and "PALESTINE SPRING SONG." I n general, the terms Palestine and Palestinian referred to the region of Palestine as it was. Thus, "Palestinian Jew" and "Palestinian Arab" are straightforward expressions. "Palestine Post" and "Palestine Philharmonic" refer to these bodies as they existed in a place then known as Palestine. The adoption of a Palestinian identity by the Arabs of Palestine is a recent phenomenon. Until the establishment of the State of Israel, and for another decade or so, the term Palestinian applied exclusively to the Jews.
2006-11-24 08:23:36
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Estimated 20-25% of the world population is now Muslim. Islam is the world's fastest growing religion.
Why then, do we not see peaceful Muslims speaking out against the violence in the middle east?
Right here in the US--where are the peaceful Muslims speaking out?
You are delusional.
2006-11-21 08:23:33
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
And you are naive.
No rally is going to stop what is happening in the MiddleEast.
The violence has to end between Israel and the Palestinians and neither side is willing to stop.
At this point, I blame Israel as much as I blame the Palestinians.
2006-11-21 07:34:53
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Its not that your suggestion isn't a good one. Its simplistic and
easy to implement.
The problem arises, however, when you are dealing with
extremists. They do not think like the rest of us. They would
use that rally as a way to get rid of their "enemies".
I wish it could work.
2006-11-21 08:09:29
·
answer #7
·
answered by producer_vortex 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
There is an expression that fits extremely well here, "From your mouth to God's ears. " Too simple yet good an answer for it to work. Nice try
2006-11-21 07:34:26
·
answer #8
·
answered by devora k 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
radical Islam are the Borg, plain and simple, they cannot be reasoned with, they only know death, so I say kill introduce every last one to Allah, done.
2006-11-21 07:50:20
·
answer #9
·
answered by 007 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
These days the western countries are happy to have the Arabs do their dirty work for them (i.e. killing Jews).
2006-11-23 04:03:10
·
answer #10
·
answered by mo mosh 6
·
0⤊
0⤋