English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I recently went to a Bush basher website. In the first paragraph he ridiculed George Bush for being a Christian. In the second paragraph he ridiculed George Bush for not being Christian.

Bashers also attack George Bush for being a dictator, while freely using every medium available: articles, columns, essays, protest marches, documentaries, bumper stickers, T-shirts, et. all.

How can Bush be a dictator when dictators don't allow people to criticize them?

Futhermore, in the Katrina aftermath Bush was criticized by these people for NOT being a dictator. According to Bashers, Bush was supposed to charge in, seize all private property, ignore all legal and contractual obligations and just start rebuilding the region according to whatever he saw fit. Hello?

Don't get me wrong. I am highly amused by the stupidity of others. But I'm worried that Bush bashers are still allowed to drive cars and to handle sharp objects. Sooner or later someone is going to get hurt.

2006-11-20 21:01:27 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

14 answers

No. You should be. You are at the other extreme - why do you think you are the sane one.

Your extensive support for him is more bizarre and questionable than our criticism, smarty pants.

2006-11-20 21:05:09 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4 3

I think it would be interesting if he did so himself and had the results of the tests made public. But, you know what? The results would be confidential. None of his medical records can be released until after his death. If he said, "Hey, folks. Here are the results of a psychological evaluation I had done 2 weeks ago. It says -------, then it would be all right. But the fact is that those things are confidential and between the patient and the doctor. Even if he were schizophrenic and having ideations of being Osama Bin Laden, nobody would be able to get him out of office until he did something impeachable. There is a lot of conjecture out there that Ronald Reagan showed signs of Alzheimer's before he left office. Some attributed it to his gunshot wounds and some, mostly Democratic people, thought he had Alzheimer's before his second term. Problem is, he wasn't diagnosed with it until after he left office. It depends on whether or not you are happy with President Bush as President. Some people actually think that President Bush's escalator doesn't make it to the mezzanine. Others really honestly believe that he is a hero. I personally think both views are off center a little bit, but just staying focused on the issue, you could be very right. On the other hand, we won't know anything about his health records until after he dies.

2016-05-22 04:56:42 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Makes Me wonder a few differant things.

1./ Your going to tell Me that George Bush is right when HE was the one that started a war that has and continues to have people killed on an every day basis. NOT just the soldeirs, but women, children and babies. Slautered...you find that right???

An illegal war. According to international law, a country must attack us physically before We are allowed to fight them. We were NEVER attacked by Iraq. There were no weapons of mass destruction, and no ties with Al Queda, and no terrorist connections what so ever, until the war.

2./ The fact that People from other countries, can come onto, or into an air port with box cutters and take over??. Then they are labeled terrorists??. Seems to Me that with all the secrete service people and their big guns, that a gun would be faster than a ...not even knife, but a Box cutter. Yet....THEY took over planes, and THEY were considered the terrorists. Also seems to ME that anyone that now carries a box cutter can now be considered terrorists. That means anyone that has a job that requires a box cutter, is a terrorist. Or how about the mundane jobs around the house where you would use a box cutter to get into something that was packed away, does that make YOU a terrorists?. Yet..George Bush thinks it does. Tell Me thats smart??..hmmm. Seems funny to Me, that a person with a box cutter can take over the United States, Out smarting the C.I.A, the F.B.I., the F.A.A, The National Transportation Safety Board, The Military, The Anti Missle Batteries that surround the White House and the Pentagon, and Out smarted GWB, Rumsfeld, Cheney, Wolfowitz, and Condolizza Rice. Remember those words that GWB spoke so empatically, " NOT ON MY WATCH!!!".

3./ How about all GWB's cronies?. The lies that the media feeds everyone. Why don't people like YOURSELF actually look things up. IF people are saying things YOU do not agree with, Why don't YOU study, and find out if what they say has any bearring, instead of critisizing .."Bush bashers"...Seems to Me what YOUR doing is not any better than the supposed Bush Bashers, that you speak of. What makes you right. Your NOT, YOur too damned lazy to check things out before comming down on anyone. Your laziness has shown through.

4./ As for Bush being a dictator, He's made it illegal for anyone to attack our government verbally, considering them enemy combatints. These laws can be found, simply by looking through internet files. They tried to make it illegal to contest a federal election if it's believed that there has been voter fraud. This sounds like the actions of a dictator to Me.

5./The media would never lie to you, considering, that most of the major stations are owned by companies, like General Electric, Reytheon, and others, who just so happen to manufacture weapons systems for the military, there by making a fortune on the war. War is big business, and corporations ARE big businesses who profit by backing GWB, Who also profits by backing the big corporations, after all, it's the corporations, who donate so much money to the election efforts of the polititions that will help them the most.

Get the picture?

Little boy, go back to school, and learn to study, because obviously, you didn't learn the first time.

2006-11-20 21:28:22 · answer #3 · answered by Enigma 2 · 3 2

All I can say is two things:
1) if you are required to take a drug test while operating heavy equipment, such as a delivery vehicle. Some are subject to randoms, THE PRESIDENT NEEDS A DRUG TEST! He's clueless and could careless about you or the bush bashers unless you are a CEO of a company who endorses campaign money with special interests.
2) PLEASE do your homework on this president! If you support the corrupt ideas of his cabinet after learning the history, then I think you should undergo psychological evaluations, because the last I checked war crimes were punishable by death, not to mention fraud and lying to the American people are also injustices.

2006-11-20 21:49:53 · answer #4 · answered by gr8teful420 2 · 2 2

Bush bashers should be psychologically evaluated when Bush himself is mandated to be checked out. We can drive and handle sharp objects, but he has control over the country, for pete's sake! Which is scarier?

2006-11-20 21:04:56 · answer #5 · answered by Rebecca 5 · 2 3

No,these are tolerant people,or they claim to be.For a man to be so stupid as they claim,the President is awfully intelligent to strategically place bombs in the wtc as they claim,he has the powers of God to cause Katrina to hit New Orleans and wipe out all those poor crack adicted black people.I think they just live for sheer hate,and this is the mentality of the democratic liberal leaders.And yet they dont hate the terrorists as much as they hate Bush.Sickening isnt it?

2006-11-20 21:08:52 · answer #6 · answered by halfbright 5 · 1 3

Dont you love freedom, we have to freedom of speech to say what we think, problem is most people dont think before speaking, if everyone took a moment and thought clearly, then there would not be that many people putting their foot in their mouth

2006-11-20 21:11:00 · answer #7 · answered by paki 5 · 1 1

Some of his critics go over the top, but I think those who still believe anything he and Dick Cheney say, after six years of being misled, need an evaluation.

2006-11-20 21:34:49 · answer #8 · answered by Dunrobin 6 · 1 2

Lots of people think Bush supporters should be required to undergo psychological evaluations.

2006-11-20 21:23:30 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

No matter how hard I try, I find it impossible to find anything good about Bush.....does this mean I need to be evaluated?

2006-11-20 21:15:03 · answer #10 · answered by PS Drummer 3 · 2 2

fedest.com, questions and answers