English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Hi all,
I thank you all for answering my previous question (will or would be a good teacher). I got some clear picture, but still got some doubt. Maybe this is too easy, but I need answer. In my previous question all said there is some condition in the case of second sentence (He says she would be a good teacher). Now please explain me the meaning of these two sentences:

1. Sam says if she is a teacher she will be a good teacher.
2. Sam says if she was a teacher she would be a good a teacher.

What I understand is: we use condition one for probable action in present or future; condition two for action which are contrary to known facts and which we don’t expect to take place in present or future.

Now the girl is not a teacher, but wants to take up that profession; and Sam thinks the girl will be a good teacher in future. Then which sentence is correct: a) Sam says, “She will be a good teacher” or b) Sam says, “She would be good teacher”.

Hope I am clear. Please answer this.

2006-11-20 19:44:18 · 3 answers · asked by samsha 1 in Education & Reference Words & Wordplay

3 answers

Since she has already made the decision to be a teacher, the correct sentence is a) Sam says, "She will be a good teacher".

2006-11-20 19:50:18 · answer #1 · answered by danaluana 5 · 0 0

I'd say "Sam says that if she were a teacher should would be a good teacher." The conditional implies that she's not yet a teacher.

2006-11-21 04:07:19 · answer #2 · answered by barrych209 5 · 0 0

if she is a teacher means she speaks of her possible future - like a girl who thinks about becoming a teacher but is too young to be one now - first conditional - correct here

if she was a teacher is about adult somebody who probably has a different job now. second conditional= unreal condition - she is not a teacher now, she choose different job.

2006-11-21 04:21:06 · answer #3 · answered by iva 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers