2006-11-20 18:59:33 · 35 answers · asked by Pommie girl 2 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Celebrities
Once she tried to use Paul's deceased wife Linda-claiming Paul had beat her-the tiny amount of credibility she had went out the window. She's a twisted,barefaced liar.
2006-11-20 19:12:26 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
She had this all planned from the start. Make him fall in love with her and have a kid, that way she's guaranteed the money. Of course she offered to sign a pre nup, if she hadn't it wouldn't look credible. Had he said yes, the problems would have started from there. She called his bluff really. She seemed so nice in the beginning, and I know she's been going through this divorce but how much charity work has anyone seen her do lately? She put on a front and she played the game. She tried to make herself seem as nice as Linda to Paul and he couldn't resist. She's now shown her true colours. She is bitter twisted and of course she is a barefaced liar! All the years Paul and Linda were together and someone like her comes along and ruins his credibility. I think she might have driven herself mad. There's definitely some underlying mental health problem there. Of course she would pass a lie detector test, she's cold hearted and probably not even human!
2006-11-20 20:18:19 · answer #2 · answered by Jo_Diva 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes she is a twisted barefaced liar. And worse. I believe she is plain evil. I'll tell you what as well. For all of the medias misdemeanours over the years they barely get it wrong and for all the mud slinging they have sent her way over the years you can bet that this is just the start. Have you heard she is now trying to sue them. I bet she has been lured into a trap. You just wait until the divorce is over and the court case begins I'll bet there is stuff that comes out about her that that makes accusations of her being a call girl sound like nothing. BRING IT ON
2006-11-21 04:10:54 · answer #3 · answered by john n 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You got it right in the first part of your question, and she is also a gold-digger of the worse kind, people say she offered to sign a pre-nup agreement, only because she knew Sir Paul would not let her, after she mentioned Linda & Paul`s marriage I really thought she could go no lower, but, I reckon now there is nothing she will not do to get her pound of flesh, It`s been said she took a lie detector test, and it proved she was not lying, well that`s a load of cobbler`s for a start. If there was any truth in what she said, do you really think Heather (no conection), Mary, Stella & James would be like they are with their Father I do not. Well that`s my opinion anyway.
2006-11-20 23:59:42 · answer #4 · answered by madge 51 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
MOST DEFINITELY Heather Mills McCartney is a twisted, barefaced liar !!!
2006-11-20 19:42:57 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Hmmm, good Q....the whole aura about this woman tells me she's nothing but a twisted, barefaced liar....gold digger also comes to mind.
Media reports about her saying that Paul McCartney has beaten her, spilled wine on her etc etc secure my feelings aboput this woman being a little on the twisted side.
My heart goes out to Paul McCartney and their daughter....especially the little one whos ended up as a pawn in Heather's chess game
2006-11-20 19:09:32 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Shes a twisted bare faced liar for sure anyoen whos read anything about Paul McCartney would know that anything shes accusing him of is untrue and shes doing it just to get more money in the divorce. Shes an evil wretched liar and I hope she dies a painful death and burns in Hell forever!
2006-11-21 13:12:57 · answer #7 · answered by ♫That'll be the Day♫ 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Definately the twisted, barefaced liar!
Someone should take that fake leg & beat her w/ it!
That b!tch is gonna be the "World's Highest Priced Hooker" when she is finished takin' Paul to the cleaners.
2006-11-20 20:30:56 · answer #8 · answered by Cat 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think that she is calculating, scheming and was always out for what she would eventually get financially and for the fame, or as it happens, the infamous character she has become.
I believe at the time of the marriage, Paul was yet to get over the death of Linda and after being with her so long, was maybe wrongly believing that he may find another soul mate.
I think Paul lost the one true love of his life when Linda died and must feel that he has now tarnished her memory by all this mud slinging and hurt. He is lucky in one resepct that he did have the opportunity to spend many years with his true soul mate but unfortunate in the fact that they were to be sperated by death.
Many people never ever get to meet the one true love of their lives and I think paul was over estimating his own personal luck to think he could do it twice.
2006-11-20 20:21:12 · answer #9 · answered by babsbob237 1 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Neither. She's had a hard life and had to fight for everything she's ever had. This does not go away simply because you achieve money and fame.
Talking of lying, would you have told him about your past if it had happened to you? I don't think everyone tells their partner the truth about their past and that doesn't make them a twisted liar, just means they want to get on with their lives and put the past behind them.
The media is responsible for constantly digging up pasts that would be better off left buried. The whole News of the World witch-hunt culture seems fine while you're reading the paper but how would you like it happening to you and all your friends reading lies about you.
2006-11-20 19:14:55 · answer #10 · answered by Carrie S 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋