the final verdict was "not guilty" wasn't it. I know he had Cochran as his lawyer but come on. Any specific reason why this guy is so infamous.
2006-11-20 17:54:52 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Media & Journalism
yeah, you say no duh or because he really did kill them. But has anybody proven it and is their conclusive proof. Did he somehow confess after the trial. What is the specific evidence?
2006-11-20 18:03:15 · update #1
Because he did it. DUH!!!!
2006-11-20 17:56:11 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
because he did it, the main evidence cochran used was the "if the glove doesnt fit you must acquit" defense, where oj "attempted" to put on the bloody glove that was found at the crime, but uh oh, he couldnt make it fit, its not like you could fake that or anything. i dont know what the jury was smoking, but obviously it was disputable enough to make a civil case out of it, and now he owes about 33 million dollars to the fmailies of the victims. and now that he is coming into all of this money for the whole "if i did it" scheme, he needs to pay those families what they deserve.
he did it plain and simple, thats why he is infamous, he literaly got away with murder
2006-11-21 02:04:49 · answer #2 · answered by Bri B 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
He admitted to doing it in jail- he yelled out "I DID IT, OK?" and a lot of people heard him.
There was Nicole's blood in his car. He had a history of domestic violence with her. The murder scene would make any man angry- that good looking guy over with a dumbass excuse- he got what he had coming to him. But yea, OJ did it, everyone knows.
The criminal trial was overwhelmingly poor, older, black women- all sympathetic to OJ.
2006-11-21 01:57:50 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hey,,, he might have gotten off the charges in a court of law,,, in the peoples minds,,, he did it,, even the civil court found him guilty in a heartbeat.... There was so much evidence not presented in the trial, blood in his bronco for one,,
No dobut he did it,, and probably had some help also.....
thank you....
2006-11-21 02:05:37 · answer #4 · answered by eejonesaux 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yeah because of the book he wrote. He wrote a book called "If I Did It." Nobody writes about a book like that unless they really did it and got away with it.
2006-11-21 01:57:47 · answer #5 · answered by tabatha16us 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He's a killer. Cochran told you, long before they demonized Furman as a racist, that all he needed was "one African-American juror". He had a blood trail up to his door but was freed by racist black jurors who would rather turn a murderer lose than lose one of their "heros".
2006-11-21 02:01:16 · answer #6 · answered by m. b 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
um isnt he coming out with a book entitled "If I did it this is how it went down" or something... id say thats pretty f*in guilty to me, the guy did it
2006-11-21 02:27:25 · answer #7 · answered by megan c 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
the public makes its own verdict...who makes a book called "if i did it" ..anyways
2006-11-21 01:59:00 · answer #8 · answered by Sir_caterpillar 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He is called a killer because that is what he is... that's why.
Do you live under a rock?
2006-11-21 02:08:16 · answer #9 · answered by Jeezuss Jan 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It's the name that fits
You must admit
2006-11-21 02:03:08 · answer #10 · answered by melissa 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Because he did.
Remember the first day he ran away? If he didn't do it, he didn't have to run!!
2006-11-21 02:57:44 · answer #11 · answered by Muskie 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋